more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13398

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 2. Descriptions / b. Definite descriptions ]

Full Idea

'The winner of the Derby' satisfies some horse, but only accidentally. But we could 'rigidify' the description by inserting 'actual' into it, giving 'the actual winner of the Derby'. Winning is a contingent property, but actually winning is necessary.

Gist of Idea

We could make a contingent description into a rigid and necessary one by adding 'actual' to it

Source

Michael Jubien (Possibility [2009], 5.1)

Book Ref

Jubien,Michael: 'Possibility' [OUP 2009], p.124


A Reaction

I like this unusual proposal because instead of switching into formal logic in order to capture the ideas we are after, he is drawing on the resources of ordinary language, offering philosophers a way of speaking plain English more precisely.


The 30 ideas from 'Possibility'

It is a mistake to think that the logic developed for mathematics can clarify language and philosophy [Jubien]
The idea that every entity must have identity conditions is an unfortunate misunderstanding [Jubien]
We should not regard essentialism as just nontrivial de re necessity [Jubien]
To analyse modality, we must give accounts of objects, properties and relations [Jubien]
First-order logic tilts in favour of the direct reference theory, in its use of constants for objects [Jubien]
If two objects are indiscernible across spacetime, how could we decide whether or not they are the same? [Jubien]
Thinking of them as 'ships' the repaired ship is the original, but as 'objects' the reassembly is the original [Jubien]
Rearranging the planks as a ship is confusing; we'd say it was the same 'object' with a different arrangement [Jubien]
Parts seem to matter when it is just an object, but not matter when it is a kind of object [Jubien]
If the statue is loved and the clay hated, that is about the object first qua statue, then qua clay [Jubien]
Objects need conventions for their matter, their temporal possibility, and their spatial possibility [Jubien]
Basically, the world doesn't have ready-made 'objects'; we carve objects any way we like [Jubien]
If objects are just conventional, there is no ontological distinction between stuff and things [Jubien]
It is incoherent to think that a given entity depends on its kind for its existence [Jubien]
Modality concerns relations among platonic properties [Jubien]
The love of possible worlds is part of the dream that technical logic solves philosophical problems [Jubien]
Possible worlds don't explain necessity, because they are a bunch of parallel contingencies [Jubien]
Philosophers reduce complex English kind-quantifiers to the simplistic first-order quantifier [Jubien]
Any entity has the unique property of being that specific entity [Jubien]
Entailment does not result from mutual necessity; mutual necessity ensures entailment [Jubien]
Analysing mental concepts points to 'inclusionism' - that mental phenomena are part of the physical [Jubien]
If an analysis shows the features of a concept, it doesn't seem to 'reduce' the concept [Jubien]
Examples show that ordinary proper names are not rigid designators [Jubien]
We could make a contingent description into a rigid and necessary one by adding 'actual' to it [Jubien]
If one entity is an object, a statue, and some clay, these come apart in at least three ways [Jubien]
The idea of coincident objects is a last resort, as it is opposed to commonsense naturalism [Jubien]
We only grasp a name if we know whether to apply it when the bearer changes [Jubien]
The category of Venus is not 'object', or even 'planet', but a particular class of good-sized object [Jubien]
To exist necessarily is to have an essence whose own essence must be instantiated [Jubien]
The baptiser picks the bearer of a name, but social use decides the category [Jubien]