more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13529

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / e. Axiom of the Empty Set IV ]

Full Idea

Empty Set Axiom: ∃x ∀y ¬ (y ∈ x). There is a set x which has no members (no y's). The empty set exists. There is a set with no members, and by extensionality this set is unique.

Gist of Idea

Empty Set: ∃x∀y ¬(y∈x). The unique empty set exists

Source

Robert S. Wolf (A Tour through Mathematical Logic [2005], 2.3)

Book Ref

Wolf,Robert S.: 'A Tour Through Mathematical Logic' [Carus Maths Monographs 2005], p.70


A Reaction

A bit bewildering for novices. It says there is a box with nothing in it, or a pair of curly brackets with nothing between them. It seems to be the key idea in set theory, because it asserts the idea of a set over and above any possible members.


The 19 ideas from Robert S. Wolf

Model theory uses sets to show that mathematical deduction fits mathematical truth [Wolf,RS]
Modern mathematics has unified all of its objects within set theory [Wolf,RS]
A 'tautology' must include connectives [Wolf,RS]
Deduction Theorem: T∪{P}|-Q, then T|-(P→Q), which justifies Conditional Proof [Wolf,RS]
Universal Generalization: If we prove P(x) with no special assumptions, we can conclude ∀xP(x) [Wolf,RS]
Universal Specification: ∀xP(x) implies P(t). True for all? Then true for an instance [Wolf,RS]
Existential Generalization (or 'proof by example'): if we can say P(t), then we can say something is P [Wolf,RS]
Most deductive logic (unlike ordinary reasoning) is 'monotonic' - we don't retract after new givens [Wolf,RS]
Comprehension Axiom: if a collection is clearly specified, it is a set [Wolf,RS]
Empty Set: ∃x∀y ¬(y∈x). The unique empty set exists [Wolf,RS]
An ordinal is an equivalence class of well-orderings, or a transitive set whose members are transitive [Wolf,RS]
Model theory reveals the structures of mathematics [Wolf,RS]
Model theory 'structures' have a 'universe', some 'relations', some 'functions', and some 'constants' [Wolf,RS]
In first-order logic syntactic and semantic consequence (|- and |=) nicely coincide [Wolf,RS]
First-order logic is weakly complete (valid sentences are provable); we can't prove every sentence or its negation [Wolf,RS]
First-order model theory rests on completeness, compactness, and the Löwenheim-Skolem-Tarski theorem [Wolf,RS]
An 'isomorphism' is a bijection that preserves all structural components [Wolf,RS]
If a theory is complete, only a more powerful language can strengthen it [Wolf,RS]
The LST Theorem is a serious limitation of first-order logic [Wolf,RS]