more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13637

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / B. Logical Consequence / 4. Semantic Consequence |= ]

Full Idea

Second-order logic is inherently incomplete, so its semantic consequence relation is not effective.

Gist of Idea

If a logic is incomplete, its semantic consequence relation is not effective

Source

Stewart Shapiro (Foundations without Foundationalism [1991], 1.2.1)

Book Ref

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Foundations without Foundationalism' [OUP 1991], p.12


The 50 ideas from 'Foundations without Foundationalism'

Second-order logic is better than set theory, since it only adds relations and operations, and nothing else [Shapiro, by Lavine]
Broad standard semantics, or Henkin semantics with a subclass, or many-sorted first-order semantics? [Shapiro]
Semantic consequence is ineffective in second-order logic [Shapiro]
Are sets part of logic, or part of mathematics? [Shapiro]
There is no 'correct' logic for natural languages [Shapiro]
The 'triumph' of first-order logic may be related to logicism and the Hilbert programme, which failed [Shapiro]
We can live well without completeness in logic [Shapiro]
Non-compactness is a strength of second-order logic, enabling characterisation of infinite structures [Shapiro]
Mathematics and logic have no border, and logic must involve mathematics and its ontology [Shapiro]
Satisfaction is 'truth in a model', which is a model of 'truth' [Shapiro]
Finding the logical form of a sentence is difficult, and there are no criteria of correctness [Shapiro]
'Satisfaction' is a function from models, assignments, and formulas to {true,false} [Shapiro]
'Weakly sound' if every theorem is a logical truth; 'sound' if every deduction is a semantic consequence [Shapiro]
An axiomatization is 'categorical' if its models are isomorphic, so there is really only one interpretation [Shapiro]
If a logic is incomplete, its semantic consequence relation is not effective [Shapiro]
Russell's paradox shows that there are classes which are not iterative sets [Shapiro]
Properties are often seen as intensional; equiangular and equilateral are different, despite identity of objects [Shapiro]
Complex numbers can be defined as reals, which are defined as rationals, then integers, then naturals [Shapiro]
Logic is the ideal for learning new propositions on the basis of others [Shapiro]
Aristotelian logic is complete [Shapiro]
Semantics for models uses set-theory [Shapiro]
Henkin semantics has separate variables ranging over the relations and over the functions [Shapiro]
In standard semantics for second-order logic, a single domain fixes the ranges for the variables [Shapiro]
Completeness, Compactness and Löwenheim-Skolem fail in second-order standard semantics [Shapiro]
The Löwenheim-Skolem theorems show an explosion of infinite models, so 1st-order is useless for infinity [Shapiro]
Choice is essential for proving downward Löwenheim-Skolem [Shapiro]
Compactness is derived from soundness and completeness [Shapiro]
A set is 'transitive' if contains every member of each of its members [Shapiro]
First-order arithmetic can't even represent basic number theory [Shapiro]
The 'continuum' is the cardinality of the powerset of a denumerably infinite set [Shapiro]
'Well-ordering' of a set is an irreflexive, transitive, and binary relation with a least element [Shapiro]
It is central to the iterative conception that membership is well-founded, with no infinite descending chains [Shapiro]
Some sets of natural numbers are definable in set-theory but not in arithmetic [Shapiro]
A language is 'semantically effective' if its logical truths are recursively enumerable [Shapiro]
Maybe compactness, semantic effectiveness, and the Löwenheim-Skolem properties are desirable [Shapiro]
Downward Löwenheim-Skolem: each satisfiable countable set always has countable models [Shapiro]
Upward Löwenheim-Skolem: each infinite model has infinite models of all sizes [Shapiro]
First-order logic was an afterthought in the development of modern logic [Shapiro]
Iterative sets are not Boolean; the complement of an iterative set is not an iterative sets [Shapiro]
Logicism is distinctive in seeking a universal language, and denying that logic is a series of abstractions [Shapiro]
Some reject formal properties if they are not defined, or defined impredicatively [Shapiro]
Skolem and Gödel championed first-order, and Zermelo, Hilbert, and Bernays championed higher-order [Shapiro]
Bernays (1918) formulated and proved the completeness of propositional logic [Shapiro]
Can one develop set theory first, then derive numbers, or are numbers more basic? [Shapiro]
Categoricity can't be reached in a first-order language [Shapiro]
The notion of finitude is actually built into first-order languages [Shapiro]
We might reduce ontology by using truth of sentences and terms, instead of using objects satisfying models [Shapiro]
Substitutional semantics only has countably many terms, so Upward Löwenheim-Skolem trivially fails [Shapiro]
Only higher-order languages can specify that 0,1,2,... are all the natural numbers that there are [Shapiro]
Natural numbers are the finite ordinals, and integers are equivalence classes of pairs of finite ordinals [Shapiro]