more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13734

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 1. Nature of Metaphysics ]

Full Idea

On the now dominant Quinean view, metaphysics is about what there is (such as properties, meanings and numbers). I will argue for the revival of a more traditional Aristotelian view, on which metaphysics is about what grounds what.

Gist of Idea

Modern Quinean metaphysics is about what exists, but Aristotelian metaphysics asks about grounding

Source

Jonathan Schaffer (On What Grounds What [2009], Intro)

Book Ref

'Metametaphysics', ed/tr. Chalmers/Manley/Wasserman [OUP 2009], p.347


A Reaction

I find that an enormously helpful distinction, and support the Aristotelian view. Schaffer's general line is that what exists is fairly uncontroversial and dull, but the interesting truths about the world emerge when we grasp its structure.

Related Idea

Idea 13735 Aristotle discusses fundamental units of being, rather than existence questions [Aristotle, by Schaffer,J]


The 12 ideas from 'On What Grounds What'

Modern Quinean metaphysics is about what exists, but Aristotelian metaphysics asks about grounding [Schaffer,J]
Maybe categories are just the different ways that things depend on basic substances [Schaffer,J]
We should not multiply basic entities, but we can have as many derivative entities as we like [Schaffer,J]
If 'there are red roses' implies 'there are roses', then 'there are prime numbers' implies 'there are numbers' [Schaffer,J]
The cosmos is the only fundamental entity, from which all else exists by abstraction [Schaffer,J]
'Moorean certainties' are more credible than any sceptical argument [Schaffer,J]
There exist heaps with no integral unity, so we should accept arbitrary composites in the same way [Schaffer,J]
Grounding is unanalysable and primitive, and is the basic structuring concept in metaphysics [Schaffer,J]
Supervenience is just modal correlation [Schaffer,J]
If you tore the metaphysics out of philosophy, the whole enterprise would collapse [Schaffer,J]
Belief in impossible worlds may require dialetheism [Schaffer,J]
The notion of 'grounding' can explain integrated wholes in a way that mere aggregates can't [Schaffer,J]