more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13736

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 1. Nature of Metaphysics ]

Full Idea

The Quinean task in metaphysics is to say what exists. What exists forms the domain of quantification. The domain is a set (or class, or plurality) - it has no internal structure. In other words, the Quinean task is to list the beings.

Gist of Idea

Quinean metaphysics just lists the beings, which is a domain with no internal structure

Source

comment on Willard Quine (works [1961]) by Jonathan Schaffer - On What Grounds What 1.1

Book Ref

'Metametaphysics', ed/tr. Chalmers/Manley/Wasserman [OUP 2009], p.348


A Reaction

I really warm to this thesis. The Quinean version is what you get when you think that logic is the best tool for explicating metaphysics. Schaffer goes on to say that the only real aim for Quine is the cardinality of what exists!


The 29 ideas from 'works'

Quinean metaphysics just lists the beings, which is a domain with no internal structure [Schaffer,J on Quine]
Set theory is full of Platonist metaphysics, so Quine aimed to keep it separate from logic [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
Quine wants V = L for a cleaner theory, despite the scepticism of most theorists [Quine, by Shapiro]
Two things can never entail three things [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
If we had to name objects to make existence claims, we couldn't discuss all the real numbers [Quine]
No sense can be made of quantification into opaque contexts [Quine, by Hale]
Finite quantification can be eliminated in favour of disjunction and conjunction [Quine, by Dummett]
Quine thought substitutional quantification confused use and mention, but then saw its nominalist appeal [Quine, by Marcus (Barcan)]
Universals are acceptable if they are needed to make an accepted theory true [Quine, by Jacquette]
For Quine, intuitionist ontology is inadequate for classical mathematics [Quine, by Orenstein]
Intuitionists only admit numbers properly constructed, but classical maths covers all reals in a 'limit' [Quine, by Orenstein]
Quine wants identity and individuation-conditions for possibilia [Quine, by Lycan]
A logically perfect language could express all truths, so all truths must be logically expressible [Quine, by Hossack]
For Quine everything exists theoretically, as reference, predication and quantification [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
Quine says we can expand predicates easily (ideology), but not names (ontology) [Quine, by Noonan]
Quine says the predicate of a true statement has no ontological implications [Quine, by Armstrong]
Quine suggests that properties can be replaced with extensional entities like sets [Quine, by Shapiro]
Quine says that if second-order logic is to quantify over properties, that can be done in first-order predicate logic [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
Quine brought classes into semantics to get rid of properties [Quine, by McGinn]
Don't analyse 'red is a colour' as involving properties. Say 'all red things are coloured things' [Quine, by Orenstein]
Definite descriptions can't unambiguously pick out an object which doesn't exist [Lycan on Quine]
For Quine the only way to know a necessity is empirically [Quine, by Dancy,J]
Quine's empiricism is based on whole theoretical systems, not on single mental events [Quine, by Orenstein]
To proclaim cultural relativism is to thereby rise above it [Quine, by Newton-Smith]
For Quine, theories are instruments used to make predictions about observations [Quine, by O'Grady]
Quine says there is no matter of fact about reference - it is 'inscrutable' [Quine, by O'Grady]
The principle of charity only applies to the logical constants [Quine, by Miller,A]
Essence gives an illusion of understanding [Quine, by Almog]
Quine is committed to sets, but is more a Class Nominalist than a Platonist [Quine, by Macdonald,C]