more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 13747
[filed under theme 7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 5. Supervenience / a. Nature of supervenience
]
Full Idea
Supervenience is mere modal correlation.
Gist of Idea
Supervenience is just modal correlation
Source
Jonathan Schaffer (On What Grounds What [2009], 2.2)
Book Ref
'Metametaphysics', ed/tr. Chalmers/Manley/Wasserman [OUP 2009], p.364
The
14 ideas
with the same theme
[defining and elucidating supervenience]:
|
12922
|
A thing 'expresses' another if they have a constant and fixed relationship
[Leibniz]
|
|
3536
|
Supervenient properties must have matching base properties
[Kim]
|
|
2310
|
Supervenience is linked to dependence
[Kim]
|
|
9650
|
Supervenience concerns whether things could differ, so it is a modal notion
[Lewis]
|
|
4077
|
Aesthetic properties of thing supervene on their physical properties
[Crane]
|
|
2392
|
Properties supervene if you can't have one without the other
[Chalmers]
|
|
10421
|
Supervenience is nowadays seen as between properties, rather than linguistic
[Swoyer]
|
|
19281
|
Interesting supervenience must characterise the base quite differently from what supervenes on it
[Hale]
|
|
15017
|
Supervenience is a modal connection
[Sider]
|
|
6155
|
Supervenience is a one-way relation of dependence or determination between properties
[Rowlands]
|
|
13747
|
Supervenience is just modal correlation
[Schaffer,J]
|
|
16039
|
Supervenience: No A-difference without a B-difference
[Bennett,K]
|
|
16043
|
Supervenience is non-symmetric - sometimes it's symmetric, and sometimes it's one-way
[Bennett,K]
|
|
18680
|
To avoid misunderstandings supervenience is often expressed negatively: no A-change without B-change
[Orsi]
|