more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13748

[filed under theme 7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 1. Grounding / a. Nature of grounding ]

Full Idea

Grounding should be taken as primitive, as per the neo-Aristotelian approach. Grounding is an unanalyzable but needed notion - it is the primitive structuring conception of metaphysics.

Gist of Idea

Grounding is unanalysable and primitive, and is the basic structuring concept in metaphysics

Source

Jonathan Schaffer (On What Grounds What [2009], 2.2)

Book Ref

'Metametaphysics', ed/tr. Chalmers/Manley/Wasserman [OUP 2009], p.364


A Reaction

[he cites K.Fine 1991] I find that this simple claim clarifies the discussions of Kit Fine, where you are not always quite sure what the game is. I agree fully with it. It makes metaphysics interesting, where cataloguing entities is boring.


The 12 ideas from 'On What Grounds What'

Modern Quinean metaphysics is about what exists, but Aristotelian metaphysics asks about grounding [Schaffer,J]
Maybe categories are just the different ways that things depend on basic substances [Schaffer,J]
We should not multiply basic entities, but we can have as many derivative entities as we like [Schaffer,J]
If 'there are red roses' implies 'there are roses', then 'there are prime numbers' implies 'there are numbers' [Schaffer,J]
The cosmos is the only fundamental entity, from which all else exists by abstraction [Schaffer,J]
'Moorean certainties' are more credible than any sceptical argument [Schaffer,J]
There exist heaps with no integral unity, so we should accept arbitrary composites in the same way [Schaffer,J]
Grounding is unanalysable and primitive, and is the basic structuring concept in metaphysics [Schaffer,J]
Supervenience is just modal correlation [Schaffer,J]
If you tore the metaphysics out of philosophy, the whole enterprise would collapse [Schaffer,J]
Belief in impossible worlds may require dialetheism [Schaffer,J]
The notion of 'grounding' can explain integrated wholes in a way that mere aggregates can't [Schaffer,J]