more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13823

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / H. Proof Systems / 4. Natural Deduction ]

Full Idea

In Gentzen's natural deduction, the inferences are broken down into atomic steps in such a way that each step involves only one logical constant. The steps are the introduction or elimination of the logical constants.

Gist of Idea

In natural deduction, inferences are atomic steps involving just one logical constant

Source

Dag Prawitz (Gentzen's Analysis of First-Order Proofs [1974], 1.1)

Book Ref

'A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic', ed/tr. Hughes,R.I.G. [Hackett 1993], p.202


The 14 ideas with the same theme [proofs built from introduction and elimination rules]:

Natural deduction shows the heart of reasoning (and sequent calculus is just a tool) [Gentzen, by Hacking]
Natural deduction takes proof from assumptions (with its rules) as basic, and axioms play no part [Bostock]
Excluded middle is an introduction rule for negation, and ex falso quodlibet will eliminate it [Bostock]
Natural deduction rules for → are the Deduction Theorem (→I) and Modus Ponens (→E) [Bostock]
In natural deduction we work from the premisses and the conclusion, hoping to meet in the middle [Bostock]
The Deduction Theorem is what licenses a system of natural deduction [Bostock]
In natural deduction, inferences are atomic steps involving just one logical constant [Prawitz]
A 'natural deduction system' has no axioms but many rules [Smith,P]
Or-elimination is 'Argument by Cases'; it shows how to derive C from 'A or B' [Williamson]
Natural deduction helpfully allows reasoning with assumptions [Sider]
Unlike axiom proofs, natural deduction proofs needn't focus on logical truths and theorems [Hale]
Many-valued logics lack a natural deduction system [Mares]
'Tonk' is supposed to follow the elimination and introduction rules, but it can't be so interpreted [Sider]
Introduction rules give deduction conditions, and Elimination says what can be deduced [Rumfitt]