more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13837

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 2. Logical Connectives / a. Logical connectives ]

Full Idea

My doctrine is that the peculiarity of the logical constants resides precisely in that given a certain pure notion of truth and consequence, all the desirable semantic properties of the constants are determined by their syntactic properties.

Gist of Idea

With a pure notion of truth and consequence, the meanings of connectives are fixed syntactically

Source

Ian Hacking (What is Logic? [1979], §09)

Book Ref

'A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic', ed/tr. Hughes,R.I.G. [Hackett 1993], p.238


A Reaction

He opposes this to Peacocke 1976, who claims that the logical connectives are essentially semantic in character, concerned with the preservation of truth.


The 11 ideas from 'What is Logic?'

'Thinning' ('dilution') is the key difference between deduction (which allows it) and induction [Hacking]
Gentzen's Cut Rule (or transitivity of deduction) is 'If A |- B and B |- C, then A |- C' [Hacking]
Only Cut reduces complexity, so logic is constructive without it, and it can be dispensed with [Hacking]
With a pure notion of truth and consequence, the meanings of connectives are fixed syntactically [Hacking]
A decent modern definition should always imply a semantics [Hacking]
Perhaps variables could be dispensed with, by arrows joining places in the scope of quantifiers [Hacking]
If it is a logic, the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem holds for it [Hacking]
First-order logic is the strongest complete compact theory with Löwenheim-Skolem [Hacking]
A limitation of first-order logic is that it cannot handle branching quantifiers [Hacking]
Second-order completeness seems to need intensional entities and possible worlds [Hacking]
The various logics are abstractions made from terms like 'if...then' in English [Hacking]