more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13843

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / J. Model Theory in Logic / 3. Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems ]

Full Idea

A Löwenheim-Skolem theorem holds for anything which, on my delineation, is a logic.

Gist of Idea

If it is a logic, the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem holds for it

Source

Ian Hacking (What is Logic? [1979], §13)

Book Ref

'A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic', ed/tr. Hughes,R.I.G. [Hackett 1993], p.246


A Reaction

I take this to be an unusually conservative view. Shapiro is the chap who can give you an alternative view of these things, or Boolos.


The 11 ideas from 'What is Logic?'

'Thinning' ('dilution') is the key difference between deduction (which allows it) and induction [Hacking]
Gentzen's Cut Rule (or transitivity of deduction) is 'If A |- B and B |- C, then A |- C' [Hacking]
Only Cut reduces complexity, so logic is constructive without it, and it can be dispensed with [Hacking]
With a pure notion of truth and consequence, the meanings of connectives are fixed syntactically [Hacking]
A decent modern definition should always imply a semantics [Hacking]
Perhaps variables could be dispensed with, by arrows joining places in the scope of quantifiers [Hacking]
If it is a logic, the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem holds for it [Hacking]
First-order logic is the strongest complete compact theory with Löwenheim-Skolem [Hacking]
A limitation of first-order logic is that it cannot handle branching quantifiers [Hacking]
Second-order completeness seems to need intensional entities and possible worlds [Hacking]
The various logics are abstractions made from terms like 'if...then' in English [Hacking]