more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13884

[filed under theme 7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 2. Types of Existence ]

Full Idea

I have the gravest doubts whether any coherent account could be given of any multiplicity of senses of 'exist'.

Gist of Idea

The idea that 'exist' has multiple senses is not coherent

Source

Crispin Wright (Frege's Concept of Numbers as Objects [1983], 2.x)

Book Ref

Wright,Crispin: 'Frege's Conception of Numbers' [Scots Philosophical Monographs 1983], p.83


A Reaction

I thoroughly agree with this thought. Do water and wind exist in different senses of 'exist'?


The 18 ideas with the same theme [whether there is more than one type of existence]:

Existence is either potential or actual [Aristotle]
Some things exist as substances, others as properties of substances [Aristotle]
I prefer a lack of form to mean non-existence, than to think of some quasi-existence [Augustine]
Everything that exists is either a substance or an accident [Albert of Saxony]
Outside the mind, there are just things and their properties [Spinoza]
The more reality a thing has, the more attributes it has [Spinoza]
There is no medium state between existence and non-existence [Hume]
Matter and intellect are inseparable correlatives which only exist relatively, and for each other [Schopenhauer]
Thoughts in the 'third realm' cannot be sensed, and do not need an owner to exist [Frege]
For Quine, there is only one way to exist [Quine, by Shapiro]
We can't accept a use of 'existence' that says only some of the things there are actually exist [Lewis]
There are only two kinds: sets, and possibilia (actual and possible particulars) [Lewis, by Oliver]
Existence doesn't come in degrees; once asserted, it can't then be qualified [Lewis]
Lewis's distinction of 'existing' from 'being actual' is Meinong's between 'existing' and 'subsisting' [Lycan on Lewis]
If 'exist' is ambiguous in 'chairs and numbers exist', that mirrors the difference between chairs and numbers [Fodor]
The idea that 'exist' has multiple senses is not coherent [Wright,C]
There are levels of existence, as well as reality; objects exist at the lowest level in which they can function [Fine,K]
Do mathematicians use 'existence' differently when they say some entity exists? [Anderson,CA]