more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13980

[filed under theme 18. Thought / A. Modes of Thought / 6. Judgement / a. Nature of Judgement ]

Full Idea

Those who find 'judgments' everywhere and propositions nowhere find that some judgments cohere whereas others are incoherent. What is the status of the terms between which these relations hold?

Gist of Idea

If you like judgments and reject propositions, what are the relata of incoherence in a judgment?

Source

Gilbert Ryle (Are there propositions? [1930], IV)

Book Ref

Ryle,Gilbert: 'Collected Essays 2 1929-1968' [Routledge 2009], p.22


A Reaction

Ryle is playing devil's advocate, but this strikes me as a nice point. I presume Russell after 1906 is the sort of thinker he has in mind.

Related Ideas

Idea 13981 Several people can believe one thing, or make the same mistake, or share one delusion [Ryle]

Idea 7534 In 1906, Russell decided that propositions did not, after all, exist [Russell, by Monk]


The 20 ideas with the same theme [how we evaluate truth and falsehood]:

Stoics said that correct judgement needs an invincible criterion of truth [Stoic school, by Fogelin]
If we utter three steps of a logical argument, they never exist together [Sext.Empiricus]
First grasp what it is, then its essential features; judgement is their compounding and division [Aquinas]
Judgement is distinguishing concepts, and seeing their relations [Fichte, by Siep]
We don't judge by combining subject and concept; we get a concept by splitting up a judgement [Frege]
The multiple relations theory says assertions about propositions are about their ingredients [Russell/Whitehead, by Linsky,B]
A judgement is a complex entity, of mind and various objects [Russell/Whitehead]
The meaning of 'Socrates is human' is completed by a judgement [Russell/Whitehead]
The multiple relation theory of judgement couldn't explain the unity of sentences [Morris,M on Russell/Whitehead]
Only the act of judging completes the meaning of a statement [Russell/Whitehead]
Knowledge of truths applies to judgements; knowledge by acquaintance applies to sensations and things [Russell]
Russell's 'multiple relations' theory says beliefs attach to ingredients, not to propositions [Russell, by Linsky,B]
Truth is when a mental state corresponds to a complex unity of external constituents [Russell]
We should judge principles by the science, not science by some fixed principles [Zermelo]
If you like judgments and reject propositions, what are the relata of incoherence in a judgment? [Ryle]
If all beliefs are propositional, then belief and judgement are the same thing [Monk]
Concepts are distinguished by roles in judgement, and are thus tied to rationality [Peacocke]
Traditionally there are twelve categories of judgement, in groups of three [Potter]
Judgement is always predicating a property of a subject [Beall/Restall]
Judgements can be unreflective and non-inferential, yet rational, by being sensitive to experience [Fricker,M]