more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13997

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 1. Nature of Time / h. Presentism ]

Full Idea

Maybe Presentists can paraphrase singular propositions about the past, into purely general past- and future-tensed sentences.

Gist of Idea

Maybe Presentists can paraphrase singular propositions about the past

Source

Ned Markosian (A Defense of Presentism [2004], 3.5)

Book Ref

'Persistence: contemporary readings', ed/tr. Haslanger,S/|Kurtz,RM [MIT 2006], p.314


A Reaction

I'm not clear why Markosian worries about singular propositions, but is happy with general ones. Surely the latter refer as much as the former to what doesn't exist? Markosian objects that the paraphrase has a different meaning.

Related Idea

Idea 13991 Presentism has the problem that if Socrates ceases to exist, so do propositions about him [Markosian]


The 13 ideas from 'A Defense of Presentism'

Presentism is the view that only present objects exist [Markosian]
Presentism has the problem that if Socrates ceases to exist, so do propositions about him [Markosian]
Presentism says if objects don't exist now, we can't have attitudes to them or relations with them [Markosian]
Presentism seems to entail that we cannot talk about other times [Markosian]
Serious Presentism says things must exist to have relations and properties; Unrestricted version denies this [Markosian]
Possible worlds must be abstract, because two qualitatively identical worlds are just one world [Markosian]
Maybe Presentists can refer to the haecceity of a thing, after the thing itself disappears [Markosian]
Maybe Presentists can paraphrase singular propositions about the past [Markosian]
Objects in the past, like Socrates, are more like imaginary objects than like remote spatial objects [Markosian]
People are mistaken when they think 'Socrates was a philosopher' says something [Markosian]
'Grabby' truth conditions first select their object, unlike 'searchy' truth conditions [Markosian]
Special Relativity denies the absolute present which Presentism needs [Markosian]
People who use science to make philosophical points don't realise how philosophical science is [Markosian]