more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14000

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 4. Meaning as Truth-Conditions ]

Full Idea

We can talk of 'grabby' truth conditions (where an object is grabbed before predication) and 'searchy' truth conditions (where the object is included in what is being asserted).

Gist of Idea

'Grabby' truth conditions first select their object, unlike 'searchy' truth conditions

Source

Ned Markosian (A Defense of Presentism [2004], 3.8)

Book Ref

'Persistence: contemporary readings', ed/tr. Haslanger,S/|Kurtz,RM [MIT 2006], p.324


A Reaction

[He credits Tom Ryckman with the terminology] I am inclined to think that the whole of language is 'searchy', even when it appears to be blatantly 'grabby'. Even ostensive reference is an act of hope rather than certainty.


The 13 ideas from Ned Markosian

Presentism is the view that only present objects exist [Markosian]
Presentism has the problem that if Socrates ceases to exist, so do propositions about him [Markosian]
Presentism says if objects don't exist now, we can't have attitudes to them or relations with them [Markosian]
Presentism seems to entail that we cannot talk about other times [Markosian]
Serious Presentism says things must exist to have relations and properties; Unrestricted version denies this [Markosian]
Possible worlds must be abstract, because two qualitatively identical worlds are just one world [Markosian]
Maybe Presentists can refer to the haecceity of a thing, after the thing itself disappears [Markosian]
Maybe Presentists can paraphrase singular propositions about the past [Markosian]
Objects in the past, like Socrates, are more like imaginary objects than like remote spatial objects [Markosian]
People are mistaken when they think 'Socrates was a philosopher' says something [Markosian]
'Grabby' truth conditions first select their object, unlike 'searchy' truth conditions [Markosian]
Special Relativity denies the absolute present which Presentism needs [Markosian]
People who use science to make philosophical points don't realise how philosophical science is [Markosian]