more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 14228

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 6. Nihilism about Objects ]

Full Idea

Van Inwagen says 'there are no tables', and 'there are tables' means 'there are some things arranged tablewise'. Presumably 'there are no tables' negates the latter claim, saying no things are arranged tablewise. But he should think that is false.

Gist of Idea

If there are no tables, but tables are things arranged tablewise, the denial of tables is a contradiction

Source

comment on Peter van Inwagen (Material Beings [1990], 10) by David Liggins - Nihilism without Self-Contradiction 3

Book Ref

'Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics', ed/tr. Le Poidevin,R [CUP 2008], p.182


A Reaction

Liggins's nice paper shows that Van Inwagen is in a potential state of contradiction when he starts saying that there are no tables, but that there are things arranged tablewise, and that they amount to tables. Liggins offers him an escape.

Related Idea

Idea 14227 We could refer to tables as 'xs that are arranged tablewise' [Inwagen]


The 43 ideas from 'Material Beings'

I assume matter is particulate, made up of 'simples' [Inwagen]
Material objects are in space and time, move, have a surface and mass, and are made of some stuff [Inwagen]
Is one atom a piece of gold, or is a sizable group of atoms required? [Inwagen]
Variables are just like pronouns; syntactic explanations get muddled over dummy letters [Inwagen]
Special Composition Question: when is a thing part of something? [Inwagen]
If contact causes composition, do two colliding balls briefly make one object? [Inwagen]
If bricks compose a house, that is at least one thing, but it might be many things [Inwagen]
The statue and lump seem to share parts, but the statue is not part of the lump [Inwagen]
The essence of a star includes the released binding energy which keeps it from collapse [Inwagen]
The strong force pulls, but also pushes apart if nucleons get too close together [Inwagen]
Nihilism says composition between single things is impossible [Inwagen]
I think parthood involves causation, and not just a reasonably stable spatial relationship [Inwagen]
The chemical reactions in a human life involve about sixteen elements [Inwagen]
A flame is like a life, but not nearly so well individuated [Inwagen]
A tumour may spread a sort of life, but it is not a life, or an organism [Inwagen]
Unlike waves, lives are 'jealous'; it is almost impossible for them to overlap [Inwagen]
Every physical thing is either a living organism or a simple [Inwagen]
If there are no tables, but tables are things arranged tablewise, the denial of tables is a contradiction [Liggins on Inwagen]
We could refer to tables as 'xs that are arranged tablewise' [Inwagen]
Actions by artefacts and natural bodies are disguised cooperations, so we don't need them [Inwagen]
Actuality proves possibility, but that doesn't explain how it is possible [Inwagen]
There is no reason to think that mere existence is a valuable thing [Inwagen]
If God were to 'reassemble' my atoms of ten years ago, the result would certainly not be me [Inwagen]
If you knead clay you make an infinite series of objects, but they are rearrangements, not creations [Inwagen]
The persistence of artifacts always covertly involves intelligent beings [Inwagen]
When an electron 'leaps' to another orbit, is the new one the same electron? [Inwagen]
Counterparts reduce counterfactual identity to problems about similarity relations [Inwagen]
I reject talk of 'stuff', and treat it in terms of particles [Inwagen]
One's mental and other life is centred on the brain, unlike any other part of the body [Inwagen]
Being part of an organism's life is a matter of degree, and vague [Inwagen]
Singular terms can be vague, because they can contain predicates, which can be vague [Inwagen]
The 'Law' of Excluded Middle needs all propositions to be definitely true or definitely false [Inwagen]
There are no heaps [Inwagen]
Life is vague at both ends, but could it be totally vague? [Inwagen]
If you reject transitivity of vague identity, there is no Ship of Theseus problem [Inwagen]
We should talk of the transitivity of 'identity', and of 'definite identity' [Inwagen]
At the lower level, life trails off into mere molecular interaction [Inwagen]
Some events are only borderline cases of lives [Inwagen]
A merely possible object clearly isn't there, so that is a defective notion [Inwagen]
Merely possible objects must be consistent properties, or haecceities [Inwagen]
We can deny whole objects but accept parts, by referring to them as plurals within things [Inwagen, by Liggins]
Maybe table-shaped particles exist, but not tables [Inwagen, by Lowe]
Mereology is 'nihilistic' (just atoms) or 'universal' (no restrictions on what is 'whole') [Inwagen, by Varzi]