more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 14358
[filed under theme 10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / d. Non-truthfunction conditionals
]
Full Idea
In the possible worlds account modus ponens is validated (the closest world, the actual, is a B-world just if B is true), and modus tollens is validated (if B is false, the actual world is not an A-world, so A is false).
Gist of Idea
In the possible worlds account of conditionals, modus ponens and modus tollens are validated
Source
Frank Jackson (Conditionals [2006], 'Famous')
Book Ref
'Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Language', ed/tr. Devitt,M/Hanley,R [Blackwell 2006], p.216
A Reaction
[see Jackson for slightly fuller versions] This looks like a minimal requirement for a decent theory of conditionals, so Jackson explains the attractions of the possible worlds view very persuasively.
The
15 ideas
with the same theme
[conditional truth adding to the components]:
14304
|
Conditionals are true when the antecedent is true, and the consequent has to be true
[Diod.Cronus]
|
14303
|
Truth-functional conditionals have a simple falsification, when A is true and B is false
[Peirce]
|
10993
|
Ramsey's Test: believe the consequent if you believe the antecedent
[Ramsey, by Read]
|
13766
|
'If' is the same as 'given that', so the degrees of belief should conform to probability theory
[Ramsey, by Ramsey]
|
14358
|
In the possible worlds account of conditionals, modus ponens and modus tollens are validated
[Jackson]
|
14359
|
Only assertions have truth-values, and conditionals are not proper assertions
[Jackson]
|
14357
|
Possible worlds account, unlike A⊃B, says nothing about when A is false
[Jackson]
|
10994
|
Conditionals are true if minimal revision of the antecedent verifies the consequent
[Stalnaker, by Read]
|
14271
|
Non-truth-functionalist say 'If A,B' is false if A is T and B is F, but deny that is always true for TT,FT and FF
[Edgington]
|
14272
|
I say "If you touch that wire you'll get a shock"; you don't touch it. How can that make the conditional true?
[Edgington]
|
13855
|
A conditional does not have truth conditions
[Edgington]
|
13859
|
X believes 'if A, B' to the extent that A & B is more likely than A & ¬B
[Edgington]
|
14311
|
Dispositions are not equivalent to stronger-than-material conditionals
[Mumford]
|
14185
|
Conditionals are just a shorthand for some proof, leaving out the details
[Read]
|
8949
|
In relevance logic, conditionals help information to flow from antecedent to consequent
[Fisher]
|