more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14377

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 10. Impossibility ]

Full Idea

To be possible is just to be one of the many manifestations of some power, and to be impossible is to be a manifestation of no power.

Gist of Idea

Possibilities are manifestations of some power, and impossibilies rest on no powers

Source

Jonathan D. Jacobs (A Powers Theory of Modality [2010], §4.2.1)

Book Ref

-: 'Philosophical Studies' [-], p.14


A Reaction

[This remark occurs in a discussion of theistic Aristotelianism] I like this. If we say that something is possible, the correct question is to ask what power could bring it about.


The 7 ideas with the same theme [negative necessity - what never could be the case]:

From the necessity of the past we can infer the impossibility of what never happens [Diod.Cronus, by White,MJ]
Things are impossible if they imply contradiction, or their production lacks an external cause [Spinoza]
A thing is shown to be impossible if a contradiction is demonstrated within its definition [Berkeley]
Nothing we clearly imagine is absolutely impossible [Hume]
Necessity implies possibility, but in experience it matters which comes first [Williams,B]
How can we know the metaphysical impossibilities; the a posteriori only concerns this world [Chalmers]
Possibilities are manifestations of some power, and impossibilies rest on no powers [Jacobs]