more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14660

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 9. Essence and Properties ]

Full Idea

Is it the case that any property had essentially by anything is had essentially by everything that has it?

Gist of Idea

If a property is ever essential, can it only ever be an essential property?

Source

Alvin Plantinga (World and Essence [1970], III)

Book Ref

Plantinga,Alvin: 'Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality' [OUP 2003], p.65


A Reaction

Plantinga says it is not true, but the only example he can give is Socrates having the property of 'being Socrates or Greek'. I take it to be universally false. There are not two types of property here. Properties sometimes play an essential role.


The 44 ideas from Alvin Plantinga

Plantinga's actualism is nominal, because he fills actuality with possibilia [Stalnaker on Plantinga]
Plantinga has domains of sets of essences, variables denoting essences, and predicates as functions [Plantinga, by Stalnaker]
Plantinga's essences have their own properties - so will have essences, giving a hierarchy [Stalnaker on Plantinga]
Possible worlds clarify possibility, propositions, properties, sets, counterfacts, time, determinism etc. [Plantinga]
Are propositions and states of affairs two separate things, or only one? I incline to say one [Plantinga]
Necessary beings (numbers, properties, sets, propositions, states of affairs, God) exist in all possible worlds [Plantinga]
Socrates is a contingent being, but his essence is not; without Socrates, his essence is unexemplified [Plantinga]
A snowball's haecceity is the property of being identical with itself [Plantinga, by Westerhoff]
Expressing modality about a statement is 'de dicto'; expressing it of property-possession is 'de re' [Plantinga]
'De dicto' true and 'de re' false is possible, and so is 'de dicto' false and 'de re' true [Plantinga]
An object has a property essentially if it couldn't conceivably have lacked it [Plantinga]
Surely self-identity is essential to Socrates? [Plantinga]
Could I name all of the real numbers in one fell swoop? Call them all 'Charley'? [Plantinga]
Can we find an appropriate 'de dicto' paraphrase for any 'de re' proposition? [Plantinga]
Maybe proper names involve essentialism [Plantinga]
What Socrates could have been, and could have become, are different? [Plantinga]
It is logically possible that natural evil like earthquakes is caused by Satan [Plantinga, by PG]
Moral evil may be acceptable to God because it allows free will (even though we don't see why this is necessary) [Plantinga, by PG]
Plantinga says there is just this world, with possibilities expressed in propositions [Plantinga, by Armstrong]
Possibilities for an individual can only refer to that individual, in some possible world [Plantinga, by Mackie,P]
A possible world contains a being of maximal greatness - which is existence in all worlds [Plantinga, by Davies,B]
Propositions can't just be in brains, because 'there are no human beings' might be true [Plantinga]
If propositions are concrete they don't have to exist, and so they can't be necessary truths [Plantinga]
The idea of abstract objects is not ontological; it comes from the epistemological idea of abstraction [Plantinga]
Theists may see abstract objects as really divine thoughts [Plantinga]
If possible Socrates differs from actual Socrates, the Indiscernibility of Identicals says they are different [Plantinga]
It doesn't matter that we can't identify the possible Socrates; we can't identify adults from baby photos [Plantinga]
A possible world is a maximal possible state of affairs [Plantinga]
Asserting a possible property is to say it would have had the property if that world had been actual [Plantinga]
If individuals can only exist in one world, then they can never lack any of their properties [Plantinga]
The counterparts of Socrates have self-identity, but only the actual Socrates has identity-with-Socrates [Plantinga]
Counterpart Theory absurdly says I would be someone else if things went differently [Plantinga]
Maybe a reliable justification must come from a process working with its 'proper function' [Plantinga, by Pollock/Cruz]
Plantinga proposes necessary existent essences as surrogates for the nonexistent things [Plantinga, by Stalnaker]
'De re' modality is as clear as 'de dicto' modality, because they are logically equivalent [Plantinga]
X is essentially P if it is P in every world, or in every X-world, or in the actual world (and not ¬P elsewhere) [Plantinga]
Properties are 'trivially essential' if they are instantiated by every object in every possible world [Plantinga]
The 'identity criteria' of a name are a group of essential and established facts [Plantinga]
'Being Socrates' and 'being identical with Socrates' characterise Socrates, so they are among his properties [Plantinga]
Does Socrates have essential properties, plus a unique essence (or 'haecceity') which entails them? [Plantinga]
Does 'being identical with Socrates' name a property? I can think of no objections to it [Plantinga]
If a property is ever essential, can it only ever be an essential property? [Plantinga]
We can imagine being beetles or alligators, so it is possible we might have such bodies [Plantinga]
Essences are instantiated, and are what entails a thing's properties and lack of properties [Plantinga]