more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14722

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 1. Nature of Time / g. Growing block ]

Full Idea

Intermediate between the polar opposites of presentism and eternalism is the view (defended by Broad 1923 and Tooley 1997) that the past is real but the future is not. Reality consists of a growing four-dimensional manifold, the 'growing block universe'.

Gist of Idea

Between presentism and eternalism is the 'growing block' view - the past is real, the future is not

Source

Theodore Sider (Four Dimensionalism [2001], 2.1)

Book Ref

Sider,Theodore: 'Four Dimensionalism' [OUP 2003], p.12


A Reaction

The obvious and plausible basis for this is that statements about the past seem to have truthmakers, but statements about the future lack them. Does a truth always require ontological commitment? Death is cessation of existence.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [past and present exist, but the future does not]:

Things may be necessary once they occur, but not be unconditionally necessary [Aristotle]
How can ten days ahead be a short time, if it doesn't exist? [Augustine]
The present and past exist, but the future does not [Broad, by Dummett]
We could say present and past exist, but not future, so that each event adds to the total history [Broad]
It is quite implausible that the future is unreal, as that would terminate everything [Lewis]
If the future is not real, we don't seem to have any obligation to future individuals [Le Poidevin]
Between presentism and eternalism is the 'growing block' view - the past is real, the future is not [Sider]
Growing block has a subjective present and a growing edge - but these could come apart [Merricks, by PG]
Neither 'moving spotlight' nor 'growing block' views explain why we care what is present or past [Zimmerman,DW]
No-Futurists believe in past and present, but not future, and say the world grows as facts increase [Bourne]
How can we know this is the present moment, if other times are real? [Baron/Miller]
If we are actually in the past then we shouldn't experience time passing [Baron/Miller]