more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14723

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 2. Passage of Time / c. Tenses and time ]

Full Idea

The temporal reductionist claims that tensed locutions are indexical - 'present' being the time of utterance etc. This generalises to say that nothing corresponding to tense need be admitted as a fundamental feature of the world.

Gist of Idea

Talk using tenses can be eliminated, by reducing it to indexical connections for an utterance

Source

Theodore Sider (Four Dimensionalism [2001], 2.1)

Book Ref

Sider,Theodore: 'Four Dimensionalism' [OUP 2003], p.13


A Reaction

[He particular cites Mellor for this view] Highly implausible. I very much doubt whether it is possible to explain the indexicality of a word like 'now' without referring to tenses. Does time only exist when sentences and thoughts occur?


The 10 ideas with the same theme [meaning of verbs of past and future]:

Time doesn't end with the Universe, because tensed statements about destruction remain true [Sext.Empiricus]
Tense is essential for thought and action [Perry, by Le Poidevin]
Actual tensed sentences cannot be tenseless, because they can cite their own context [Perry, by Le Poidevin]
At the very least, minds themselves seem to be tensed [Le Poidevin]
Fiction seems to lack a tensed perspective, and offers an example of tenseless language [Le Poidevin]
A-theorists tend to reject the tensed/tenseless distinction [Fine,K]
It is said that in the A-theory, all existents and objects must be tensed, as well as the sentences [Fine,K]
It is the view of the future that really decides between tensed and tenseless views of time [Le Poidevin]
Talk using tenses can be eliminated, by reducing it to indexical connections for an utterance [Sider]
The past, present and future walked into a bar.... [Sommers,W]