more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 14723

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 2. Passage of Time / c. Tenses and time ]

Full Idea

The temporal reductionist claims that tensed locutions are indexical - 'present' being the time of utterance etc. This generalises to say that nothing corresponding to tense need be admitted as a fundamental feature of the world.

Gist of Idea

Talk using tenses can be eliminated, by reducing it to indexical connections for an utterance

Source

Theodore Sider (Four Dimensionalism [2001], 2.1)

Book Ref

Sider,Theodore: 'Four Dimensionalism' [OUP 2003], p.13


A Reaction

[He particular cites Mellor for this view] Highly implausible. I very much doubt whether it is possible to explain the indexicality of a word like 'now' without referring to tenses. Does time only exist when sentences and thoughts occur?


The 29 ideas from 'Four Dimensionalism'

Artists 'create' statues because they are essentially statues, and so lack identity with the lump of clay [Sider]
Metaphysical enquiry can survive if its conclusions are tentative [Sider]
Between presentism and eternalism is the 'growing block' view - the past is real, the future is not [Sider]
Talk using tenses can be eliminated, by reducing it to indexical connections for an utterance [Sider]
Presentists must deny truths about multiple times [Sider]
Maybe motion is a dynamical quantity intrinsic to a thing at a particular time [Sider]
Proper ontology should only use categorical (actual) properties, not hypothetical ones [Sider]
Three-dimensionalists assert 'enduring', being wholly present at each moment, and deny 'temporal parts' [Sider]
Four-dimensionalists assert 'temporal parts', 'perduring', and being spread out over time [Sider]
4D says intrinsic change is difference between successive parts [Sider]
4D says each spatiotemporal object must have a temporal part at every moment at which it exists [Sider]
Temporal parts exist, but are not prior building blocks for objects [Sider]
Temporal parts are instantaneous [Sider]
The B-series involves eternalism, and the reduction of tense [Sider]
Space is 3D and lacks a direction; time seems connected to causation [Sider]
The B-theory is adequate, except that it omits to say which time is present [Sider]
If Tib is all of Tibbles bar her tail, when Tibbles loses her tail, two different things become one [Sider]
The ship undergoes 'asymmetric' fission, where one candidate is seen as stronger [Sider]
The stage view of objects is best for dealing with coincident entities [Sider]
'Composition as identity' says that an object just is the objects which compose it [Sider]
If sortal terms fix the kind and the persistence conditions, we need to know what kinds there are [Sider]
If you say Leibniz's Law doesn't apply to 'timebound' properties, you are no longer discussing identity [Sider]
For Presentists there must always be a temporal vantage point for any description [Sider]
Mereological essentialism says an object's parts are necessary for its existence [Sider]
How can an instantaneous stage believe anything, if beliefs take time? [Sider]
Four-dimensionalism sees things and processes as belonging in the same category [Sider]
Four-dimensionalism says temporal parts are caused (through laws of motion) by previous temporal parts [Sider]
Counterparts rest on similarity, so there are many such relations in different contexts [Sider]
Some might say that its inconsistency with time travel is a reason to favour three-dimensionalism [Sider]