more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14750

[filed under theme 9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 3. Unity Problems / d. Coincident objects ]

Full Idea

Michael Burke has given an account that avoids distinguishing coinciding entities. ...The statue/lump satisfies both 'lump' and 'statue', but only the latter determines that object's persistence conditions, and so is that object's 'dominant sortal'.

Gist of Idea

Two entities can coincide as one, but only one of them (the dominant sortal) fixes persistence conditions

Source

report of Michael Burke (Dion and Theon: an essentialist solution [1994]) by Theodore Sider - Four Dimensionalism 5.4

Book Ref

Sider,Theodore: 'Four Dimensionalism' [OUP 2003], p.161


A Reaction

Presumably a lump on its own can have its own persistance conditions (as a 'lump'), but those would presumably be lost if you shaped it into a statue. Burke concedes that. Can of worms. Using a book as a doorstop...


The 8 ideas from Michael Burke

Persistence conditions cannot contradict, so there must be a 'dominant sortal' [Burke,M, by Hawley]
The 'dominant' of two coinciding sortals is the one that entails the widest range of properties [Burke,M, by Sider]
'The rock' either refers to an object, or to a collection of parts, or to some stuff [Burke,M, by Wasserman]
Tib goes out of existence when the tail is lost, because Tib was never the 'cat' [Burke,M, by Sider]
Sculpting a lump of clay destroys one object, and replaces it with another one [Burke,M, by Wasserman]
Burke says when two object coincide, one of them is destroyed in the process [Burke,M, by Hawley]
Maybe the clay becomes a different lump when it becomes a statue [Burke,M, by Koslicki]
Two entities can coincide as one, but only one of them (the dominant sortal) fixes persistence conditions [Burke,M, by Sider]