more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 14806

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 4. Regularities / a. Regularity theory ]

Full Idea

The mechanical philosopher leaves the whole specification of the world utterly unaccounted for, which is pretty nearly as bad as to baldly attribute it to chance.

Gist of Idea

If the world is just mechanical, its whole specification has no more explanation than mere chance

Source

Charles Sanders Peirce (The Doctrine of Necessity Examined [1892], p.337)

Book Ref

Peirce,Charles Sanders: 'Philosophical Writings of Peirce', ed/tr. Buchler,Justus [Dover 1940], p.337


A Reaction

If now complete is even remotely available, then that doesn't seem to matter too much, but if there is one message modern physics teaches philosophy, it is that we should not give up on trying to answer the deeper questions.


The 4 ideas from 'The Doctrine of Necessity Examined'

The more precise the observations, the less reliable appear to be the laws of nature [Peirce]
Is chance just unknown laws? But the laws operate the same, whatever chance occurs [Peirce]
Is there any such thing as death among the lower organisms? [Peirce]
If the world is just mechanical, its whole specification has no more explanation than mere chance [Peirce]