more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14860

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 7. Against Metaphysics ]

Full Idea

In a certain sense, Kant's influence was detrimental; for the belief in metaphysics has been lost.

Gist of Idea

Kant has undermined our belief in metaphysics

Source

Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1872-74 [1873], 19 [028])

Book Ref

Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'Unpublished of 'Unfashionable Obs' period (v 11)', ed/tr. Gray,Richard T. [Stanford 1995], p.10


A Reaction

As I understand it, there are two interpretations of Kant, one of which is fairly thoroughly anti-metaphysical, and another which is less so. Also one path leads to idealism and the other doesn't, but I need to research that.

Related Idea

Idea 6203 Metaphysics is just a priori universal principles of physics [Kant]


The 14 ideas with the same theme [rejections of metaphysics as a worthwhile activity]:

Kant exposed the illusions of reason in the Transcendental Dialectic [Kant, by Fraassen]
On the continent it is generally believed that metaphysics died with Hegel [Benardete,JA on Hegel]
The demonstrations of the metaphysicians are all moonshine [Peirce]
Kant has undermined our belief in metaphysics [Nietzsche]
Metaphysics is finding bad reasons for instinctive beliefs [Bradley]
The empiricist says that metaphysics is meaningless, rather than false [Schlick]
Metaphysics uses empty words, or just produces pseudo-statements [Carnap]
Humeans rejected the a priori synthetic, and so rejected even Kantian metaphysics [Ayer, by Macdonald,C]
Philosophy has been relieved of physics, cosmology, politics, and now must give up ontology [Badiou]
'Quietist' says abandon metaphysics because answers are unattainable (as in Kant's noumenon) [Fine,K]
After 1903, Husserl avoids metaphysical commitments [Mares]
Wide metaphysical possibility may reduce metaphysics to analysis of fantasies [Maudlin]
Science has discovered properties of things, so there are properties - so who needs metaphysics? [Hofweber]
'Fundamentality' is either a superficial idea, or much too obscure [Hofweber]