more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 15096

[filed under theme 14. Science / C. Induction / 5. Paradoxes of Induction / a. Grue problem ]

Full Idea

Perhaps 'grue' has causal features, but only derivatively, in virtue of its relation to green.

Gist of Idea

'Grue' only has causal features because of its relation to green

Source

Sydney Shoemaker (Causal and Metaphysical Necessity [1998], III)

Book Ref

Shoemaker,Sydney: 'Identity, Cause and Mind' [OUP 2003], p.413


A Reaction

I take grue to be a behaviour, and not a property at all. The problem only arises because the notion of a 'property' became too lax. Presumably Shoemaker should also mention blue in his account.


The 10 ideas from 'Causal and Metaphysical Necessity'

Restrict 'logical truth' to formal logic, rather than including analytic and metaphysical truths [Shoemaker]
We might say laws are necessary by combining causal properties with Armstrong-Dretske-Tooley laws [Shoemaker]
'Grue' only has causal features because of its relation to green [Shoemaker]
A property's causal features are essential, and only they fix its identity [Shoemaker]
I claim that a property has its causal features in all possible worlds [Shoemaker]
I now deny that properties are cluster of powers, and take causal properties as basic [Shoemaker]
If something is possible, but not nomologically possible, we need metaphysical possibility [Shoemaker]
Empirical evidence shows that imagining a phenomenon can show it is possible [Shoemaker]
Imagination reveals conceptual possibility, where descriptions avoid contradiction or incoherence [Shoemaker]
Once you give up necessity as a priori, causal necessity becomes the main type of necessity [Shoemaker]