more on this theme
|
more from this text
Single Idea 15126
[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 7. Eliminating causation
]
Full Idea
Perhaps science doesn't need a robust conception of causation, and can get by with thinking of causal laws in a Humean way, as the simplest generalization over the mosaic.
Gist of Idea
Maybe scientific causation is just generalisation about the patterns
Source
John Hawthorne (Causal Structuralism [2001], 1.5)
Book Ref
Hawthorne,John: 'Metaphysical Essays' [OUP 2002], p.219
A Reaction
The Humean view he is referring to is held by David Lewis. That seems a council of defeat. We observe from a distance, but make no attempt to explain.
The
17 ideas
from John Hawthorne
14588
|
Modern metaphysicians tend to think space-time points are more fundamental than space-time regions
[Hawthorne]
|
14589
|
A modal can reverse meaning if the context is seen differently, so maybe context is all?
[Hawthorne]
|
14590
|
If we accept scattered objects such as archipelagos, why not think of cars that way?
[Hawthorne]
|
14591
|
Four-dimensionalists say instantaneous objects are more fundamental than long-lived ones
[Hawthorne]
|
19551
|
How can we know the heavyweight implications of normal knowledge? Must we distort 'knowledge'?
[Hawthorne]
|
19552
|
We wouldn't know the logical implications of our knowledge if small risks added up to big risks
[Hawthorne]
|
19554
|
Denying closure is denying we know P when we know P and Q, which is absurd in simple cases
[Hawthorne]
|
19553
|
Commitment to 'I have a hand' only makes sense in a context where it has been doubted
[Hawthorne]
|
15121
|
An individual essence is a necessary and sufficient profile for a thing
[Hawthorne]
|
15123
|
Is the causal profile of a property its essence?
[Hawthorne]
|
15122
|
Could two different properties have the same causal profile?
[Hawthorne]
|
15124
|
If properties are more than their powers, we could have two properties with the same power
[Hawthorne]
|
15126
|
Maybe scientific causation is just generalisation about the patterns
[Hawthorne]
|
15127
|
A categorical basis could hardly explain a disposition if it had no powers of its own
[Hawthorne]
|
15128
|
We can treat the structure/form of the world differently from the nodes/matter of the world
[Hawthorne]
|
15125
|
We only know the mathematical laws, but not much else
[Hawthorne]
|
8970
|
Our notion of identical sets involves identical members, which needs absolute identity
[Hawthorne]
|