more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15172

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 7. Essence and Necessity / c. Essentials are necessary ]

Full Idea

It is clear, of course, that if there are true essential predications, then they express necessary properties.

Gist of Idea

Clearly, essential predications express necessary properties

Source

Alan Sidelle (Necessity, Essence and Individuation [1989], Ch.2)

Book Ref

Sidelle,Alan: 'Necessity, Essence and Individuation' [Cornell 1989], p.26


A Reaction

I would certainly want to ask whether essences have to be analysed as properties, and also (more boldly) whether there might not be contingent essences.


The 9 ideas with the same theme [what is essential is also necessary]:

Aristotle doesn't see essential truths or essential properties as necessary [Aristotle, by Koslicki]
The predicates of a thing's nature are necessary to it [Aristotle]
We can only slightly know necessary co-existence of qualities, if they are primary [Locke]
A property may belong essentially to one thing and contingently to another [Kung]
Trivially essential properties are existence, self-identity, and de dicto necessities [Forbes,G]
Clearly, essential predications express necessary properties [Sidelle]
Kinship is essence that comes in degrees, and age groups are essences that change over time [Gelman]
If an object exists, then its essential properties are necessary [Koslicki]
Essential properties are necessary, but necessary properties may not be essential [Vaidya]