more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
It is clear, of course, that if there are true essential predications, then they express necessary properties.
Gist of Idea
Clearly, essential predications express necessary properties
Source
Alan Sidelle (Necessity, Essence and Individuation [1989], Ch.2)
Book Ref
Sidelle,Alan: 'Necessity, Essence and Individuation' [Cornell 1989], p.26
A Reaction
I would certainly want to ask whether essences have to be analysed as properties, and also (more boldly) whether there might not be contingent essences.
15107 | Aristotle doesn't see essential truths or essential properties as necessary [Aristotle, by Koslicki] |
17039 | The predicates of a thing's nature are necessary to it [Aristotle] |
12560 | We can only slightly know necessary co-existence of qualities, if they are primary [Locke] |
11997 | A property may belong essentially to one thing and contingently to another [Kung] |
13806 | Trivially essential properties are existence, self-identity, and de dicto necessities [Forbes,G] |
15172 | Clearly, essential predications express necessary properties [Sidelle] |
15687 | Kinship is essence that comes in degrees, and age groups are essences that change over time [Gelman] |
15112 | If an object exists, then its essential properties are necessary [Koslicki] |
19262 | Essential properties are necessary, but necessary properties may not be essential [Vaidya] |