more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15187

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 2. Passage of Time / e. Tensed (A) series ]

Full Idea

It has been argued that the tensed view of time is actually committed to the unreality, not just of the future, but of the past also.

Gist of Idea

It is claimed that the tense view entails the unreality of both future and past

Source

Robin Le Poidevin (Intro to 'Questions of Time and Tense' [1998], Intro)

Book Ref

'Questions of Time and Tense', ed/tr. Le Poidevin,R [OUP 2002], p.2


A Reaction

There seem to be strong and weak version here, since if you are committed to tenses, you are presumably committed to the possibility of truths about the past and future. The strong version (denying past and future) seems to make tenses pointless.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [A-series, with the present as a distinctive moment]:

The present moment is obviously a necessary feature of time [Aristotle]
The Hopi have no concept of time as something flowing from past to future [Whorf]
'Thank goodness that's over' is not like 'thank goodness that happened on Friday' [Prior,AN]
The past, present, future and tenses of A-theory are too weird, and should be analysed indexically [Smart]
It is claimed that the tense view entails the unreality of both future and past [Le Poidevin]
We share a common now, but not a common here [Le Poidevin]
Tensed theorists typically try to reduce the tenseless to the tensed [Le Poidevin]
There is one ordered B series, but an infinitude of A series, depending on when the present is [Maudlin]
A-theorists, unlike B-theorists, believe some sort of objective distinction between past, present and future [Zimmerman,DW]
Time flows, past is fixed, future is open, future is feared but not past, we remember past, we plan future [Bourne]
The A-series says a past event is becoming more past, but how can it do that? [Bardon]
The A-series has to treat being past, present or future as properties [Baron/Miller]