more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
A worry haunts the denial of tense: if tense is just mind-dependent, then minds at least themselves must be tensed.
Gist of Idea
At the very least, minds themselves seem to be tensed
Source
Robin Le Poidevin (Intro to 'Questions of Time and Tense' [1998], 2)
Book Ref
'Questions of Time and Tense', ed/tr. Le Poidevin,R [OUP 2002], p.4
15186 | In the tenseless view, all times are equally real, so statements of the future have truth-values [Le Poidevin] |
15187 | It is claimed that the tense view entails the unreality of both future and past [Le Poidevin] |
15188 | If things don't persist through time, then change makes no sense [Le Poidevin] |
15189 | Things which have ceased change their A-series position; things that persist change their B-series position [Le Poidevin] |
15192 | We share a common now, but not a common here [Le Poidevin] |
15191 | At the very least, minds themselves seem to be tensed [Le Poidevin] |
15190 | Evil can't be an illusion, because then the illusion that there is evil would be evil [Le Poidevin] |
15193 | The new tenseless theory offers indexical truth-conditions, instead of a reductive analysis [Le Poidevin] |
15195 | If the future is not real, we don't seem to have any obligation to future individuals [Le Poidevin] |
15196 | God being inside or outside of time both raise a group of difficult problems [Le Poidevin] |
15197 | Fiction seems to lack a tensed perspective, and offers an example of tenseless language [Le Poidevin] |