more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15229

[filed under theme 19. Language / F. Communication / 5. Pragmatics / a. Contextual meaning ]

Full Idea

To attribute necessity to a condition, an outcome or effect, the truth of a statement, or a conclusion, is to indicate within the relevant context that no alternative is possible. In each context there are appropriate grounds for such judgements.

Gist of Idea

We say there is 'no alternative' in all sorts of contexts, and there are many different grounds for it

Source

Harré,R./Madden,E.H. (Causal Powers [1975], 1.V)

Book Ref

Harré,R/Madden,E.H.: 'Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity' [Blackwell 1975], p.19


A Reaction

This anticipipates Kit Fine's account of necessity by 25 years, and seems to be the right way to understand it. In ordinary usage, 'there is no alternative' is obvious a quite different claim in very different contexts.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [aspects of meaning which are decided by context]:

A good way of explaining an expression is saying what conditions make its contexts true [Quine]
We say there is 'no alternative' in all sorts of contexts, and there are many different grounds for it [Harré/Madden]
People slide from contextual variability all the way to contextual determination [Bach]
'Semantic type coercion' is selecting the reading of a word to make the best sense [Hofweber]
The Naive view of communication is that hearers acquire exactly the thoughts of the speaker [Recanati]
The domain of an assertion is restricted by context, either semantically or pragmatically [Rayo/Uzquiano]
A sentence can be meaningful, and yet lack a truth value [Magidor]
In the pragmatic approach, presuppositions are assumed in a context, for successful assertion [Magidor]
The basic Kaplan view is that there is truth-conditional content, and contextual character [Cappelen/Dever]
It is proposed that a huge range of linguistic items are context-sensitive [Cappelen/Dever]