more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Even in cases (such as Goldbach's Conjecture) which, if true, are logically necessary, we may be able to conceive the opposite. We can conceive of there being a number which is not the sum of two primes.
Gist of Idea
If Goldbach's Conjecture is true (and logically necessary), we may be able to conceive its opposite
Source
Harré,R./Madden,E.H. (Causal Powers [1975], 3.II)
Book Ref
Harré,R/Madden,E.H.: 'Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity' [Blackwell 1975], p.66
A Reaction
[attributed to Kneale] Ah, but can we conceive this (as Descartes would say) 'clearly and distinctly'? I can conceive circular squares, as long as I don't concentrate too hard.
3642 | Pythagoras' Theorem doesn't cease to be part of the essence of triangles just because we doubt it [Arnauld on Descartes] |
16582 | We can imagine a point swelling and contracting - but not how this could be done [Hobbes] |
11958 | Impossibilites are easily conceived in mathematics and geometry [Reid, by Molnar] |
8562 | It is possible to conceive what is not possible [Shoemaker] |
15252 | If Goldbach's Conjecture is true (and logically necessary), we may be able to conceive its opposite [Harré/Madden] |
9660 | The impossible can be imagined as long as it is a bit vague [Lewis] |
2407 | One can wrongly imagine two things being non-identical even though they are the same (morning/evening star) [Chalmers] |
3106 | If claims of metaphysical necessity are based on conceivability, we should be cautious [Segal] |
10652 | Conceivability may indicate possibility, but literary fantasy does not [Varzi] |
14714 | Contradictory claims about a necessary god both seem apriori coherent [Schroeter] |