more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15328

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 8. Theories in Logic ]

Full Idea

A theory is 'non-conservative' if it allows us to prove mathematical facts that go beyond what the background mathematical theory can prove on its own.

Gist of Idea

A theory is 'non-conservative' if it facilitates new mathematical proofs

Source

Leon Horsten (The Tarskian Turn [2011], 01.4)

Book Ref

Horsten,Leon: 'The Tarskian Turn' [MIT 2011], p.7


A Reaction

This is an instance of the relationship with mathematics being used as the test case for explorations of logic. It is a standard research method, because it is so precise, but should not be mistaken for the last word about a theory.


The 9 ideas with the same theme [complete sets of propositions derived from some start]:

Despite Gödel, Frege's epistemic ordering of all the truths is still plausible [Frege, by Burge]
The primitive simples of arithmetic are the essence, determining the subject, and its boundaries [Frege, by Jeshion]
'Theorems' are both proved, and used in proofs [Frege]
To study formal systems, look at the whole thing, and not just how it is constructed in steps [Curry]
A 'theorem' of a theory is a sentence derived from the axioms using the proof system [Smith,P]
Theories in logic are sentences closed under consequence, but in truth discussions theories have axioms [Fine,K]
A theory is logically closed, which means infinite premisses [Read]
A theory is 'non-conservative' if it facilitates new mathematical proofs [Horsten]
A theory is some formulae and all of their consequences [Halbach]