more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 15434
[filed under theme 9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 1. Structure of an Object
]
Full Idea
There is a necessary connection between the instantiating of a structural universal by the whole and the instantiating of other universals by its parts. We can call the relation 'involvement', a nondescript word.
Gist of Idea
Structural universals have a necessary connection to the universals forming its parts
Source
David Lewis (Against Structural Universals [1986], 'What are')
Book Ref
Lewis,David: 'Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology' [CUP 1999], p.81
A Reaction
In the case of a shape, I suppose the composing 'universals' [dunno what they are] will all be essential to the shape - that is, part of the very nature of the thing, loss of which would destroy the identity.
The
15 ideas
with the same theme
[general ideas about how objects must be structured]:
15465
|
Structures don't explain dispositions, because they consist of dispositions
[Martin,CB]
|
15476
|
Structural properties involve dispositionality, so cannot be used to explain it
[Martin,CB]
|
12685
|
Categorical properties depend only on the structures they represent
[Ellis]
|
15800
|
All events and objects are dispositional, and hence all structural properties are dispositional
[Fetzer]
|
15452
|
We could not uphold a truthmaker for 'Fa' without structures
[Lewis]
|
15448
|
The 'magical' view of structural universals says they are atoms, even though they have parts
[Lewis]
|
15449
|
If 'methane' is an atomic structural universal, it has nothing to connect it to its carbon universals
[Lewis]
|
15439
|
The 'pictorial' view of structural universals says they are wholes made of universals as parts
[Lewis]
|
15441
|
The structural universal 'methane' needs the universal 'hydrogen' four times over
[Lewis]
|
15445
|
Butane and Isobutane have the same atoms, but different structures
[Lewis]
|
15434
|
Structural universals have a necessary connection to the universals forming its parts
[Lewis]
|
15437
|
We can't get rid of structural universals if there are no simple universals
[Lewis]
|
11917
|
Structural properties are derivate properties
[Molnar]
|
11955
|
There are no 'structural properties', as properties with parts
[Molnar]
|
14535
|
Pandispositionalists say structures are clusters of causal powers
[Mumford/Anjum]
|