more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 15434

[filed under theme 9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 1. Structure of an Object ]

Full Idea

There is a necessary connection between the instantiating of a structural universal by the whole and the instantiating of other universals by its parts. We can call the relation 'involvement', a nondescript word.

Gist of Idea

Structural universals have a necessary connection to the universals forming its parts

Source

David Lewis (Against Structural Universals [1986], 'What are')

Book Ref

Lewis,David: 'Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology' [CUP 1999], p.81

A Reaction

In the case of a shape, I suppose the composing 'universals' [dunno what they are] will all be essential to the shape - that is, part of the very nature of the thing, loss of which would destroy the identity.

The 15 ideas with the same theme [general ideas about how objects must be structured]:

15465 Structures don't explain dispositions, because they consist of dispositions [Martin,CB]
15476 Structural properties involve dispositionality, so cannot be used to explain it [Martin,CB]
12685 Categorical properties depend only on the structures they represent [Ellis]
15800 All events and objects are dispositional, and hence all structural properties are dispositional [Fetzer]
15452 We could not uphold a truthmaker for 'Fa' without structures [Lewis]
15448 The 'magical' view of structural universals says they are atoms, even though they have parts [Lewis]
15449 If 'methane' is an atomic structural universal, it has nothing to connect it to its carbon universals [Lewis]
15439 The 'pictorial' view of structural universals says they are wholes made of universals as parts [Lewis]
15441 The structural universal 'methane' needs the universal 'hydrogen' four times over [Lewis]
15445 Butane and Isobutane have the same atoms, but different structures [Lewis]
15434 Structural universals have a necessary connection to the universals forming its parts [Lewis]
15437 We can't get rid of structural universals if there are no simple universals [Lewis]
11917 Structural properties are derivate properties [Molnar]
11955 There are no 'structural properties', as properties with parts [Molnar]
14535 Pandispositionalists say structures are clusters of causal powers [Mumford/Anjum]