more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15507

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / a. Axioms for sets ]

Full Idea

Set theory has its unofficial axioms, traditional remarks about the nature of classes. They are never argued, but are passed heedlessly from one author to another. One of these says that the classes are nowhere: they are outside space and time.

Gist of Idea

Set theory has some unofficial axioms, generalisations about how to understand it

Source

David Lewis (Parts of Classes [1991], 2.1)

Book Ref

Lewis,David: 'Parts of Classes' [Blackwell 1991], p.31


A Reaction

Why don't the people who write formal books on set theory ever say things like this?


The 33 ideas with the same theme [general points about the basics of set theory]:

Cantor gives informal versions of ZF axioms as ways of getting from one set to another [Cantor, by Lake]
Axiomatising set theory makes it all relative [Skolem]
Zermelo showed that the ZF axioms in 1930 were non-categorical [Zermelo, by Hallett,M]
Zermelo published his axioms in 1908, to secure a controversial proof [Zermelo, by Maddy]
ZFC: Existence, Extension, Specification, Pairing, Unions, Powers, Infinity, Choice [Zermelo, by Clegg]
Set theory can be reduced to a few definitions and seven independent axioms [Zermelo]
Zermelo made 'set' and 'member' undefined axioms [Zermelo, by Chihara]
For Zermelo's set theory the empty set is zero and the successor of each number is its unit set [Zermelo, by Blackburn]
We perceive the objects of set theory, just as we perceive with our senses [Gödel]
Gödel show that the incompleteness of set theory was a necessity [Gödel, by Hallett,M]
Von Neumann defines each number as the set of all smaller numbers [Neumann, by Blackburn]
ZFC could contain a contradiction, and it can never prove its own consistency [MacLane]
NF has no models, but just blocks the comprehension axiom, to avoid contradictions [Quine, by Dummett]
ZF set theory has variables which range over sets, 'equals' and 'member', and extensionality [Dummett]
The main alternative to ZF is one which includes looser classes as well as sets [Dummett]
A few axioms of set theory 'force themselves on us', but most of them don't [Boolos]
We could add axioms to make sets either as small or as large as possible [Bostock]
Set theory reduces to a mereological theory with singletons as the only atoms [Lewis, by MacBride]
Set theory has some unofficial axioms, generalisations about how to understand it [Lewis]
There cannot be a set theory which is complete [Smith,P]
The standard Z-F Intuition version of set theory has about ten agreed axioms [Benardete,JA, by PG]
Set theory can't be axiomatic, because it is needed to express the very notion of axiomatisation [Mayberry]
There is a semi-categorical axiomatisation of set-theory [Mayberry]
The first-order ZF axiomatisation is highly non-categorical [Hallett,M]
Non-categoricity reveals a sort of incompleteness, with sets existing that the axioms don't reveal [Hallett,M]
New axioms are being sought, to determine the size of the continuum [Maddy]
A Large Cardinal Axiom would assert ever-increasing stages in the hierarchy [Maddy]
Determinacy: an object is either in a set, or it isn't [Zalabardo]
ZFC set theory has only 'pure' sets, without 'urelements' [Reck/Price]
Even the elements of sets in ZFC are sets, resting on the pure empty set [George/Velleman]
Maybe set theory need not be well-founded [Varzi]
Major set theories differ in their axioms, and also over the additional axioms of choice and infinity [Friend]
The iterated conception of set requires continual increase in axiom strength [Rumfitt]