more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15540

[filed under theme 7. Existence / B. Change in Existence / 1. Nature of Change ]

Full Idea

To say that properties are really relations to times is to treat temporary intrinsics (such as my changing shape) as a matter of relations, but then 'intrinsic properties' would not deserve the name, and it is untenable if it denies temporary intrinsics.

Gist of Idea

You can't deny temporary intrinsic properties by saying the properties are relations (to times)

Source

David Lewis (Rearrangement of Particles [1988], 1)

Book Ref

Lewis,David: 'Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology' [CUP 1999], p.188


A Reaction

[I have compressed a paragraph; he refers to his 1986:204] If a property is meant to be a 'relation to a time', I am not sure what the relata are meant to be, and I agree with Lewis that this seems a long way from properties.


The 29 ideas with the same theme [how existence can persist even when becoming different]:

All our concepts of change and permanence are just names, not the truth [Parmenides]
Empedocles says things are at rest, unless love unites them, or hatred splits them [Empedocles, by Aristotle]
Nothing comes from non-existence, or passes into it [Democritus, by Diog. Laertius]
How can beauty have identity if it changes? [Plato]
The best things (gods, healthy bodies, good souls) are least liable to change [Plato]
There seem to be two sorts of change: alteration and motion [Plato]
There are six kinds of change: generation, destruction, increase, diminution, alteration, change of place [Aristotle]
True change is in a thing's logos or its matter, not in its qualities [Aristotle]
A change in qualities is mere alteration, not true change [Aristotle]
If the substratum persists, it is 'alteration'; if it doesn't, it is 'coming-to-be' or 'passing-away' [Aristotle]
Nature is an active principle of change, like potentiality, but it is intrinsic to things [Aristotle]
Change is the implied actuality of that which exists potentially [Aristotle]
The sophists thought a man in the Lyceum is different from that man in the marketplace [Aristotle]
The totality is complete, so there is no room for it to change, and nothing extraneous to change it [Epicurus]
Everything is changing, including yourself and the whole universe [Aurelius]
Change is nothing but movement [Hobbes]
How could change consist of a conjunction of changeless facts? [McTaggart, by Le Poidevin]
Change is not just having two different qualities at different points in some series [McTaggart]
A 'Cambridge Change' is like saying 'the landscape changes as you travel east' [Dummett]
Humeans can only explain change with continuity as successive replacement [Harré/Madden]
You can't deny temporary intrinsic properties by saying the properties are relations (to times) [Lewis]
Maybe particles are unchanging, and intrinsic change in things is their rearrangement [Lowe, by Lewis]
Heraclitus says change is new creation, and Spinoza that it is just phases of the one substance [Lowe]
Four theories of qualitative change are 'a is F now', or 'a is F-at-t', or 'a-at-t is F', or 'a is-at-t F' [Lowe, by PG]
Change can be of composition (the component parts), or quality (properties), or substance [Lowe]
Traditionally, the four elements are just what persists through change [Harte,V]
Four-dimensional ontology has no change, since that needs an object, and time to pass [Simons]
There are real relational changes, as well as bogus 'Cambridge changes' [Simons]
Change exists, it is causal, and it needs an explanation [Williams,NE]