more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15558

[filed under theme 14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / f. Necessity in explanations ]

Full Idea

It is said that a good explanation ought to show that the explanandum event had to happen, given the laws and circumstances.

Clarification

The 'explanandum' is the thing to be explained

Gist of Idea

A good explanation is supposed to show that the event had to happen

Source

David Lewis (Causal Explanation [1986], V)

Book Ref

Lewis,David: 'Philosophical Papers Vol.2' [OUP 1986], p.228


A Reaction

I cautiously go along with this view. Given that there are necessities in nature (a long story), we should aim to reveal them. There is no higher aspiration open to us than successful explanation. Lewis says good explanations can reveal falsehoods.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [explanations as revealing necessities in events]:

To understand a phenomenon, we must understand why it is necessary, not merely contingent [Spinoza, by Cottingham]
Essentialists don't infer from some to all, but from essences to necessary behaviour [Ellis]
A good explanation is supposed to show that the event had to happen [Lewis]
An explanation shows why it was necessary that the effect occurred [Lipton]
Mathematics can show why some surprising events have to occur [Colyvan]