more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 15647

[filed under theme 3. Truth / A. Truth Problems / 2. Defining Truth ]

Full Idea

It is far from clear that a definition of truth can lead to a philosophically satisfactory theory of truth. Tarski's theorem on the undefinability of the truth predicate needs resources beyond those of the language for which it is being defined.

Gist of Idea

Truth definitions don't produce a good theory, because they go beyond your current language

Source

Volker Halbach (Axiomatic Theories of Truth (2005 ver) [2005], 1)

Book Ref

'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.2


A Reaction

The idea is that you need a 'metalanguage' for the definition. If I say 'p' is a true sentence in language 'L', I am not making that observation from within language L. The dream is a theory confined to the object language.

Related Idea

Idea 15648 Instead of a truth definition, add a primitive truth predicate, and axioms for how it works [Halbach]


The 10 ideas from 'Axiomatic Theories of Truth (2005 ver)'

Truth definitions don't produce a good theory, because they go beyond your current language [Halbach]
Axiomatic theories of truth need a weak logical framework, and not a strong metatheory [Halbach]
Instead of a truth definition, add a primitive truth predicate, and axioms for how it works [Halbach]
In semantic theories of truth, the predicate is in an object-language, and the definition in a metalanguage [Halbach]
We can use truth instead of ontologically loaded second-order comprehension assumptions about properties [Halbach]
Instead of saying x has a property, we can say a formula is true of x - as long as we have 'true' [Halbach]
Should axiomatic truth be 'conservative' - not proving anything apart from implications of the axioms? [Halbach]
If truth is defined it can be eliminated, whereas axiomatic truth has various commitments [Halbach]
Deflationists say truth merely serves to express infinite conjunctions [Halbach]
To prove the consistency of set theory, we must go beyond set theory [Halbach]