more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15676

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / c. Right and good ]

Full Idea

Rawls defends the thesis of the priority of the right over the good.

Gist of Idea

Rawls defends the priority of right over good

Source

report of John Rawls (A Theory of Justice [1972]) by James Gordon Finlayson - Habermas Ch.7:100

Book Ref

Finlayson,James G.: 'Habermas' [OUP 2005], p.100


A Reaction

It depends whether you are talking about actions, or about states of affairs. I don't see how any state of affairs can be preferred to the good one. It may be that the highest duty of action is to do what is right, rather than to achieve what is good.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [distinguishing what is good from right action]:

Hobbes shifted from talk of 'the good' to talk of 'rights' [Hobbes, by Tuck]
Is 'productive of happiness' the definition of 'right', or the cause of it? [Ross on Bentham]
Morality originally judged people, and actions only later on [Nietzsche]
For Moore, 'right' is what produces good [Moore,GE, by Ross]
'Right' means 'cause of good result' (hence 'useful'), so the end does justify the means [Moore,GE]
'Right' and 'good' differ in meaning, as in a 'right action' and a 'good man' [Ross]
If there are two equally good acts, they may both be right, but neither a duty [Ross]
In the past 'right' just meant what is conventionally accepted [Ross]
Goodness is a wider concept than just correct ethical conduct [Ross]
Motives decide whether an action is good, and what is done decides whether it was right [Ross]
Rawls defends the priority of right over good [Rawls, by Finlayson]
Teleological theories give the good priority over concern for people [Kymlicka]