more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15706

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / e. Anti scientific essentialism ]

Full Idea

One major argument against the view that essences are real is the rampant essentializing of categories that are socially constructed (such as race, caste and occupation).

Gist of Idea

A major objection to real essences is the essentialising of social categories like race, caste and occupation

Source

Susan A. Gelman (The Essential Child [2003], 11 'Is essentialism')

Book Ref

Gelman,Susan A.: 'The Essential Child' [OUP 2005], p.299


A Reaction

You can't argue with that. It raises the question of whether the approach of scientific essentialism has any value in the social, rather than physical, sciences. We jokingly essentialise groups of people such as referees or Oxonians.


The 17 ideas with the same theme [objections to essences in scientific investigation]:

The cosmos has two elements - passive matter, and active cause (or reason) which shapes it [Stoic school, by Seneca]
The motions of the planets could only derive from an intelligent agent [Newton]
That gravity should be innate and essential to matter is absurd [Newton]
If properties and qualities arise from an inward essence, we will remain ignorant of nature [Berkeley]
We can never know origins, purposes or inner natures [Comte]
The limit of science is isomorphism of theories, with essences a matter of indifference [Weyl]
We can't say 'necessarily if x is in water then x dissolves' if we can't quantify modally [Quine]
Essence gives an illusion of understanding [Quine, by Almog]
Essentialist views of science prevent further questions from being raised [Popper]
How can essences generate the right powers to vary with distance between objects? [Armstrong]
H2O isn't necessary, because different laws of nature might affect how O and H combine [Lowe]
The reductionism found in scientific essentialism is mistaken [Oderberg]
Dispositional essentialism can't explain its key distinction between essential and non-essential properties [Psillos]
Can anything in science reveal the necessity of what it discovers? [Sidelle]
A major objection to real essences is the essentialising of social categories like race, caste and occupation [Gelman]
Defining an essence comes no where near giving a thing's nature [Almog]
Essences promise to reveal reality, but actually drive us away from it [Almog]