more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 15785
[filed under theme 7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 11. Ontological Commitment / a. Ontological commitment
]
Full Idea
We must distinguish between what we are committed to existing in the actual world or a possible world ('ontology'), and what we are committed to as a part of our ways of dealing with the world conceptually, as a part of our conceptual system ('ideology').
Gist of Idea
Our commitments are to an 'ontology', but also to an 'ideology', or conceptual system
Source
Jaakko Hintikka (Semantics for Propositional Attitudes [1969], p.95), quoted by William Lycan - The Trouble with Possible Worlds 02
Book Ref
'The Possible and the Actual', ed/tr. Loux,Michael J. [Cornell 1979], p.280
A Reaction
I think this is the most illuminating idea I have read on the subject of ontological commitment. I'm fighting for the idea that what we think is true should be kept separate from what we think exists. Ideology is a nice addition to the mix.
Related Idea
Idea 15786
Commitment to possible worlds is part of our ideology, not part of our ontology [Hintikka]
The
21 ideas
with the same theme
[nature of existence commitments]:
|
10784
|
Whenever there's speech it has to be about something
[Plato]
|
|
13879
|
For Frege, ontological questions are to be settled by reference to syntactic structures
[Frege, by Wright,C]
|
|
6060
|
'Existence' means that a propositional function is sometimes true
[Russell]
|
|
13938
|
A linguistic framework involves commitment to entities, so only commitment to the framework is in question
[Carnap]
|
|
19485
|
Names have no ontological commitment, because we can deny that they name anything
[Quine]
|
|
11101
|
General terms don't commit us ontologically, but singular terms with substitution do
[Quine]
|
|
8496
|
What actually exists does not, of course, depend on language
[Quine]
|
|
10667
|
A logically perfect language could express all truths, so all truths must be logically expressible
[Quine, by Hossack]
|
|
15785
|
Our commitments are to an 'ontology', but also to an 'ideology', or conceptual system
[Hintikka]
|
|
10548
|
The context principle for names rules out a special philosophical sense for 'existence'
[Dummett]
|
|
10281
|
The objects we recognise the world as containing depends on the structure of our language
[Dummett]
|
|
18211
|
You can reduce ontological commitment by expanding the logic
[Field,H]
|
|
12226
|
The identity of Pegasus with Pegasus may be true, despite the non-existence
[Hale/Wright]
|
|
7678
|
Ontology must include the minimum requirements for our semantics
[Jacquette]
|
|
8258
|
Two of the main rivals for the foundations of ontology are substances, and facts or states-of-affairs
[Lowe]
|
|
8301
|
Some abstractions exist despite lacking causal powers, because explanation needs them
[Lowe]
|
|
12449
|
Modern metaphysics often derives ontology from the logical forms of sentences
[Azzouni]
|
|
10643
|
We speak of a theory's 'ideological commitments' as well as its 'ontological commitments'
[Linnebo]
|
|
10668
|
We are committed to a 'group' of children, if they are sitting in a circle
[Hossack]
|
|
14491
|
Rival ontological claims can both be true, if there are analytic relationships between them
[Thomasson]
|
|
18770
|
We can distinguish 'ontological' from 'existential' commitment, for different kinds of being
[Anderson,CA]
|