more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 15792
[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 4. Impossible objects
]
Full Idea
Meinong's Objects have sometimes been construed as sets of properties.
Gist of Idea
Maybe non-existent objects are sets of properties
Source
William Lycan (The Trouble with Possible Worlds [1979], 09)
Book Ref
'The Possible and the Actual', ed/tr. Loux,Michael J. [Cornell 1979], p.302
A Reaction
[Lycan cites Castaņeda and T.Parsons] You still seem to have the problem with any 'bundle' theory of anything. A non-existent object is as much intended to be an object as anything on my desk right now. It just fails to be.
The
17 ideas
with the same theme
[status of 'objects' that can't actually exist]:
10945
|
Some philosophers say that in some qualified way non-existent things 'are'
[Aristotle]
|
7756
|
Meinong said all objects of thought (even self-contradictions) have some sort of being
[Meinong, by Lycan]
|
15781
|
The objects of knowledge are far more numerous than objects which exist
[Meinong]
|
21531
|
Common sense agrees with Meinong (rather than Russell) that 'Pegasus is a flying horse' is true
[Lackey on Russell]
|
21545
|
I prefer to deny round squares, and deal with the difficulties by the theory of denoting
[Russell]
|
21547
|
On Meinong's principles 'the existent round square' has to exist
[Russell]
|
18777
|
If the King of France is not bald, and not not-bald, this violates excluded middle
[Linsky,B on Russell]
|
15783
|
Definite descriptions can't unambiguously pick out an object which doesn't exist
[Lycan on Quine]
|
16435
|
Plantinga proposes necessary existent essences as surrogates for the nonexistent things
[Plantinga, by Stalnaker]
|
18948
|
There is an object for every set of properties (some of which exist, and others don't)
[Parsons,T, by Sawyer]
|
14617
|
Predicates can't apply to what doesn't exist
[Stalnaker]
|
15792
|
Maybe non-existent objects are sets of properties
[Lycan]
|
18852
|
A Meinongian principle might say that there is an object for any modest class of properties
[Rosen]
|
14392
|
Fregeans say 'hobbits do not exist' is just 'being a hobbit' is not exemplified
[Merricks]
|
12448
|
Things that don't exist don't have any properties
[Azzouni]
|
18766
|
's is non-existent' cannot be said if 's' does not designate
[Anderson,CA]
|
18768
|
We cannot pick out a thing and deny its existence, but we can say a concept doesn't correspond
[Anderson,CA]
|