more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 15822

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / A. Speculations on Nature / 1. Nature ]

Full Idea

It is generally agreed, I think, that the concept of physical necessity, or a law of nature, is fundamental to the theory of causation and, more generally, to the concept of nature.

Gist of Idea

The concept of physical necessity is basic to both causation, and to the concept of nature

Source

Roderick Chisholm (Person and Object [1976], 2.3)

Book Ref

Chisholm,Roderick: 'Person and Object' [Open Court 1976], p.60


A Reaction

This seems intuitively right, but we might be able to formulate a concept of nature that had a bit less necessity in it, especially if we read a few books on quantum theory first.

Related Idea

Idea 15820 A 'law of nature' is just something which is physically necessary [Chisholm]


The 32 ideas from 'Person and Object'

Many philosophers aim to understand metaphysics by studying ourselves [Chisholm]
I use variables to show that each item remains the same entity throughout [Chisholm]
Bad theories of the self see it as abstract, or as a bundle, or as a process [Chisholm]
The property of being identical with me is an individual concept [Chisholm]
A state of affairs pertains to a thing if it implies that it has some property [Chisholm]
If some dogs are brown, that entails the properties of 'being brown' and 'being canine' [Chisholm]
Being the tallest man is an 'individual concept', but not a haecceity [Chisholm]
A haecceity is a property had necessarily, and strictly confined to one entity [Chisholm]
A traditional individual essence includes all of a thing's necessary characteristics [Chisholm]
Maybe we can only individuate things by relating them to ourselves [Chisholm]
I am picked out uniquely by my individual essence, which is 'being identical with myself' [Chisholm]
People use 'I' to refer to themselves, with the meaning of their own individual essence [Chisholm]
A peach is sweet and fuzzy, but it doesn't 'have' those qualities [Chisholm]
Sartre says the ego is 'opaque'; I prefer to say that it is 'transparent' [Chisholm]
Do sense-data have structure, location, weight, and constituting matter? [Chisholm]
'I feel depressed' is more like 'he runs slowly' than like 'he has a red book' [Chisholm]
If we can say a man senses 'redly', why not also 'rectangularly'? [Chisholm]
So called 'sense-data' are best seen as 'modifications' of the person experiencing them [Chisholm]
A 'law of nature' is just something which is physically necessary [Chisholm]
Determinism claims that every event has a sufficient causal pre-condition [Chisholm]
The concept of physical necessity is basic to both causation, and to the concept of nature [Chisholm]
Some propose a distinct 'agent causation', as well as 'event causation' [Chisholm]
There are mere omissions (through ignorance, perhaps), and people can 'commit an omission' [Chisholm]
There is 'loose' identity between things if their properties, or truths about them, might differ [Chisholm]
Some properties, such as 'being a widow', can be seen as 'rooted outside the time they are had' [Chisholm]
I propose that events and propositions are two types of states of affairs [Chisholm]
Some properties can never be had, like being a round square [Chisholm]
The mark of a state of affairs is that it is capable of being accepted [Chisholm]
Explanations have states of affairs as their objects [Chisholm]
Events are states of affairs that occur at certain places and times [Chisholm]
If x is ever part of y, then y is necessarily such that x is part of y at any time that y exists [Chisholm, by Simons]
Intermittence is seen in a toy fort, which is dismantled then rebuilt with the same bricks [Chisholm, by Simons]