more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
In the physical sciences the particular observations and experimental results are usually orderable, while in the biological sciences it is the classes of organism which are ordered, not the particular organisms.
Gist of Idea
In physical sciences particular observations are ordered, but in biology only the classes are ordered
Source
Rom Harré (Laws of Nature [1993], 3)
Book Ref
Harré,Rom: 'Laws of Nature' [Duckworth 1993], p.67
A Reaction
Harré is interesting on the role of ordering in science. Functions can be defined by an order. Maths feeds on orderings. Physics, he notes, focuses on things which vary together.
| 6026 | How can you investigate without some preconception of your object? [Sext.Empiricus] |
| 12109 | We must observe in order to form theories, but connected observations need prior theories [Comte] |
| 22655 | Scientific genius extracts more than other people from the same evidence [James] |
| 15880 | In physical sciences particular observations are ordered, but in biology only the classes are ordered [Harré] |
| 3858 | A full understanding of 'yellow' involves some theory [Newton-Smith] |
| 3587 | Seeing electrons in a cloud chamber requires theory [Williams,M] |
| 16851 | The inference to observables and unobservables is almost the same, so why distinguish them? [Lipton] |
| 6792 | If theories need observation, and observations need theories, how do we start? [Bird] |