more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Explicating a phenomenon is to deduce it from something else in nature more known to us than the thing to be explained by it.
Gist of Idea
Explanation is deducing a phenomenon from some nature better known to us
Source
Robert Boyle (The Origin of Forms and Qualities [1666], p.46?), quoted by Peter Alexander - Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles
Book Ref
Alexander,Peter: 'Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles' [CUP 1985], p.59
A Reaction
Interesting that the word 'deduce' is here, beloved of the 'covering law' view. But this may be deduced from the behaviour of other substances, as the iron filing behaviour may be explained by the magnet itself (or perhaps 'laws' of magnetism).
Related Idea
Idea 17075 Scientific explanation tends to reduce things to the unfamiliar (not the familiar) [Smart]
15964 | Boyle's secondary qualities are not illusory, or 'in the mind' [Boyle, by Alexander,P] |
15965 | Boyle attacked a contemporary belief that powers were occult things [Boyle, by Alexander,P] |
16735 | In the 17th century, 'disposition' usually just means the spatial arrangement of parts [Boyle, by Pasnau] |
15962 | Boyle's term 'texture' is not something you feel, but is unobservable structures of particles [Boyle, by Alexander,P] |
15952 | The corpuscles just have shape, size and motion, which explains things without 'sympathies' or 'forces' [Boyle, by Alexander,P] |
15972 | The corpuscular theory allows motion, but does not include forces between the particles [Boyle, by Alexander,P] |
16034 | Form is not a separate substance, but just the manner, modification or 'stamp' of matter [Boyle] |
15957 | Essential definitions show the differences that discriminate things, and make them what they are [Boyle] |
15960 | Explanation is deducing a phenomenon from some nature better known to us [Boyle] |
15953 | To cite a substantial form tells us what produced the effect, but not how it did it [Boyle] |