more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15969

[filed under theme 9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 6. Identity between Objects ]

Full Idea

There is never any problem about what makes two things identical; two things can never be identical.

Gist of Idea

Two things can never be identical, so there is no problem

Source

David Lewis (On the Plurality of Worlds [1986], 4.1)

Book Ref

Lewis,David: 'On the Plurality of Worlds' [Blackwell 2001], p.193


A Reaction

This expresses Lewis's preference for usage of the word 'identity', rather than a simple solution. It pays no attention to type-identity, which is an obvious phenomenon. In some sense, it is just obvious that two electrons are 'identical'.

Related Idea

Idea 15968 Identity is simple - absolutely everything is self-identical, and nothing is identical to another thing [Lewis]


The 20 ideas with the same theme [two objects turning out to be one object]:

Two things relate either as same or different, or part of a whole, or the whole of the part [Plato]
Carneades denied the transitivity of identity [Carneades, by Chisholm]
Identity between objects is not a consequence of identity, but part of what 'identity' means [Frege, by Dummett]
Identity of physical objects is just being coextensive [Quine]
If Hesperus and Phosophorus are the same, they can't possibly be different [Kripke]
Identity statements can be contingent if they rely on descriptions [Kripke]
Identity statements make sense only if there are possible individuating conditions [Benacerraf]
There can't be vague identity; a and b must differ, since a, unlike b, is only vaguely the same as b [Evans, by PG]
A is necessarily A, so if B is A, then B is also necessarily A [Wiggins]
Claims on contingent identity seem to violate Leibniz's Law [Gibbard]
Two things can never be identical, so there is no problem [Lewis]
All identity is necessary, though identity statements can be contingently true [McGinn]
'Lightning is electric discharge' and 'Phosphorus is Venus' are synthetic a posteriori identities [Lycan]
We would understand identity between objects, even if their existence was impossible [Fine,K]
If two things are equal, each side involves a necessity, so the equality is necessary [Gallois]
Occasional Identity: two objects can be identical at one time, and different at others [Gallois, by Hawley]
Identities can be true despite indeterminate reference, if true under all interpretations [Schaffer,J]
Identity statements are informative if they link separate mental files [Recanati]
Identical entities must be of the same category, and meet the criteria for the category [Thomasson]
Identity claims between objects are only well-formed if the categories are specified [Thomasson]