more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15972

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / A. Speculations on Nature / 7. Later Matter Theories / b. Corpuscles ]

Full Idea

Though there is motion, the corpuscles will not be dynamic because the idea of forces between the particles or groups of them does not figure in the theory.

Gist of Idea

The corpuscular theory allows motion, but does not include forces between the particles

Source

report of Robert Boyle (The Origin of Forms and Qualities [1666]) by Peter Alexander - Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles 5.2

Book Ref

Alexander,Peter: 'Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles' [CUP 1985], p.120


A Reaction

This is the view of Locke, as well as of Boyle. I quote this because I take to it be a particular target of Leibniz's disagreement.


The 7 ideas with the same theme [matter is just collections of smaller parts]:

Every extended material substance is composed of parts distant from one another [William of Ockham]
Cold and hot are the swiftness and slowness of corpuscular motion [Beeckman]
Colours arise from the rarity, density and mixture of matter [Digby]
The corpuscular theory allows motion, but does not include forces between the particles [Boyle, by Alexander,P]
An attraction of a body is the sum of the forces of their particles [Newton]
Atomism is the commonest version of corpuscularianism, but isn't required by it [Pasnau]
If there are just arrangements of corpuscles, where are the boundaries between substances? [Pasnau]