more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 16039
[filed under theme 7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 5. Supervenience / a. Nature of supervenience
]
Full Idea
The slogan for supervenience might be 'there cannot be an A-difference without a B-difference'. …(qualifying as a 'perfect forgery' would be an example).
Gist of Idea
Supervenience: No A-difference without a B-difference
Source
Karen Bennett (Supervenience [2011], Intro)
Book Ref
'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.1
A Reaction
The key point about supervenience is that it is one-way. Presumably 'tracking' would be a better single word for it than 'dependence', which implies some sort of causal power. Supervenience describes, but doesn't attempt to explain.
The
14 ideas
with the same theme
[defining and elucidating supervenience]:
12922
|
A thing 'expresses' another if they have a constant and fixed relationship
[Leibniz]
|
3536
|
Supervenient properties must have matching base properties
[Kim]
|
2310
|
Supervenience is linked to dependence
[Kim]
|
9650
|
Supervenience concerns whether things could differ, so it is a modal notion
[Lewis]
|
4077
|
Aesthetic properties of thing supervene on their physical properties
[Crane]
|
2392
|
Properties supervene if you can't have one without the other
[Chalmers]
|
10421
|
Supervenience is nowadays seen as between properties, rather than linguistic
[Swoyer]
|
19281
|
Interesting supervenience must characterise the base quite differently from what supervenes on it
[Hale]
|
15017
|
Supervenience is a modal connection
[Sider]
|
6155
|
Supervenience is a one-way relation of dependence or determination between properties
[Rowlands]
|
13747
|
Supervenience is just modal correlation
[Schaffer,J]
|
16039
|
Supervenience: No A-difference without a B-difference
[Bennett,K]
|
16043
|
Supervenience is non-symmetric - sometimes it's symmetric, and sometimes it's one-way
[Bennett,K]
|
18680
|
To avoid misunderstandings supervenience is often expressed negatively: no A-change without B-change
[Orsi]
|