more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Being one in form is just another way of saying one 'in definition'.
Gist of Idea
Unity of the form is just unity of the definition
Source
Aristotle (Physics [c.337 BCE], 190a16)
Book Ref
Aristotle: 'Physics', ed/tr. Waterfield,Robin [OUP 1996], p.25
A Reaction
I take this to be highly significant in understanding Aristotle. The crucial notion of form is tied to the way in which we understand the world, and does not refer to some independent fact about how it might really be.
16109 | Things are a unity because there is no clash between potential matter and actual shape/form [Aristotle] |
16088 | Aristotle's solution to the problem of unity is that form is an active cause or potentiality or nature [Aristotle, by Gill,ML] |
16104 | Unity of the form is just unity of the definition [Aristotle] |
13277 | The 'form' is the recipe for building wholes of a particular kind [Aristotle, by Koslicki] |
16766 | One thing needs a single thing to unite it; if there were two forms, something must unite them [Aquinas] |
16765 | Humans only have a single substantial form, which contains the others and acts for them [Aquinas] |
16614 | Matter and form give true unity; subject and accident is just unity 'per accidens' [Duns Scotus] |
16780 | Partial forms of leaf and fruit are united in the whole form of the tree [Suárez] |
16758 | The best support for substantial forms is the co-ordinated unity of a natural being [Suárez] |
12700 | Form or soul gives unity and duration; matter gives multiplicity and change [Leibniz] |
16748 | Aquinas says a substance has one form; Scotists say it has many forms [Pasnau] |