more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16125

[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 2. Aims of Definition ]

Full Idea

Let's take the kind posited and cut it in two, .then follow the righthand part of what we've cut, and hold onto things that the sophist is associated with until we strip away everything he has in common with other things, then display his peculiar nature.

Gist of Idea

To reveal a nature, divide down, and strip away what it has in common with other things

Source

Plato (The Statesman [c.356 BCE], 264e)

Book Ref

Plato: 'Complete Works', ed/tr. Cooper,John M. [Hackett 1997], p.289


A Reaction

This seems to be close to Aristotle's account of definition, when he is trying to get at what-it-is-to-be some thing. But if you strip away everything the definiendum has in common with other things, will anything remain?


The 19 ideas with the same theme [what a definition is trying to achieve]:

To reveal a nature, divide down, and strip away what it has in common with other things [Plato]
No one wants to define 'weaving' just for the sake of weaving [Plato]
Definitions of things that are caused must express their manner of generation [Hobbes]
All the intrinsic properties of a thing should be deducible from its definition [Spinoza]
Definitions exhibit the exhaustive concept of a thing within its boundaries [Kant]
A simplification which is complete constitutes a definition [Kant]
Later Frege held that definitions must fix a function's value for every possible argument [Frege, by Wright,C]
A definition need not capture the sense of an expression - just get the reference right [Frege, by Dummett]
A correct definition is what can be substituted without loss of meaning [Ducasse]
Some definitions aim to fix a reference rather than give a meaning [Kripke]
Defining terms either enables elimination, or shows that they don't require elimination [Lewis]
A definition needs to apply to the same object across possible worlds [Gupta]
The 'revision theory' says that definitions are rules for improving output [Gupta]
Definitions make our intuitions mathematically useful [Mayberry]
Precision is only one of the virtues of a good definition [Zagzebski]
Definitions concern how we should speak, not how things are [Fine,K]
Definitions should be replaceable by primitives, and should not be creative [Brown,JR]
A definition should allow the defined term to be eliminated [Horsten]
An explicit definition enables the elimination of what is defined [Halbach]